mypetjawa v. 2.0 (beta) "<i>Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to ev

June 10, 2005

Iranian blogger facing the death penalty for insulting the prophets

Check this out and spread the word. Public outcry can help save these men.

Cross-posted at Have I got a story for you...

Posted by: Suzanne at 12:41 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.

Dean spanked for inflammatory comments

WASHINGTON Â— When Howard Dean was chosen to head their party, Democrats looked forward to the benefits of his bristling energy and zest for political combat.
But at a private meeting Thursday on Capitol Hill, a number of worried Senate Democrats warned Dean that he had been going overboard and needed to choose his words more carefully.
The former Vermont governor and unsuccessful presidential candidate recently referred to the GOP as "pretty much a white, Christian party" and declared that a lot of Republicans have "never made an honest living in their lives."
Sen. Russell D. Feingold (D-Wis.) said that at the Capitol Hill meeting, "there couldn't be any doubt that there was some concern, even by Dean himself," about how his comments had been received.
The meeting had been scheduled to discuss party strategy before Dean's controversial comments.
Also Thursday, two Democrats seen as rising stars Â— Rep. Harold Ford of Tennessee and Virginia Gov. Mark R. Warner Â— made a point of distancing themselves from Dean's remarks.
Ford, who plans a Senate run next year, said on the Don Imus radio show that if Dean could not "temper his comments, it may get to the point where the party may need to look elsewhere for leadership, because he does not speak for me."
Ford later told The Times that Dean was "leading us in a direction that makes it difficult to winÂ…. His leadership right now is not serving any of us very well."

Keep it up, Dean!

Cross-posted at Suzanne's Blog (please note the name change)

Posted by: Suzanne at 12:33 PM | Comments (28) | Add Comment
Post contains 271 words, total size 2 kb.

1 So the Dem's draw the line at diversity with nut-jobs?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 12:57 PM (x+5JB)

2 Hehe, it looks like Darth-Rove's plan is going exactly according to schedule. MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 10, 2005 01:02 PM (0yYS2)

3 There are still a lot of Democrats who are proud of Dean and defend his comments. They are criticizing those Democrats who are criticizing Dean. These criticizers are perilously close to being thrown down the stairs by their bretheren for being Dean Apostates. I would direct you to Kos as an example, but would highly recommend wearing a full body condom before hand and taking a decontamination shower afterwards.

Posted by: Oyster at June 10, 2005 01:12 PM (fl6E1)

4 Oh Yeeeeaahhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!! Gotta love the guy for pure entertainment value.

Posted by: Howsie at June 10, 2005 01:34 PM (D3+20)

5 Name change??? I looked but still ??? Have you married or something?? If so congratulations. If not ????

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 03:06 PM (D3+20)

6 >>>"There are still a lot of Democrats who are proud of Dean and defend his comments." How can Dean's comments be defended? First he says he hates Republican, then he says Republicans are white christians, does that mean he hates white christians? What a fool. Even Dems know what a moron he is.

Posted by: Carlos at June 10, 2005 03:54 PM (paKD6)

7 Howie: I won't use the wine line again. Are you responding to e-mails via these posts by accident???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 05:54 PM (aUkZ7)

8 "There are still a lot of Democrats who are proud of Dean and defend his comments" -----Oyster "How can Dean's comments be defended? " -----Carlos Remember Carlos, these are the Black Helicopter people. Up is down, black is white, freedom is slavery, etc. ad infinitum. If you want to see what it's like to be a liberal, try an experiment: Read 1984 (Orwell), and Brave New World (Huxley), and at every instance where you feel thankful that our world is not like those in the books, remember that this is where liberals say to themselves; "too bad our world isn't like that". Liberals have even managed a form of newspeak, where diversity means conformity, equality means primacy, tolerance means intolerance, and liberal no longer means liberal, from Latin for "free", but now means something more along the lines of totalitarian fascist. Remember that whatever the libs accuse their enemies of is that of which they themselves are the most guilty. It's an old trick perfected by Lenin and taught to generations of Communist agents and their useful idiots. The only known antidote to liberal propaganda is the truth, which is why they fight so hard to control the media, for he who controls the media controls the truth.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 10, 2005 06:52 PM (0yYS2)

9 My blog name changed from "Descarte's Bar and Grill" to "Have I got a story for you..." Although I did get married 10 months ago... :-)

Posted by: Labosseuse at June 10, 2005 07:46 PM (Xjv2p)

10 Maximus Inaccurate: In response to this... "If you want to see what it's like to be a liberal, try an experiment: Read 1984 (Orwell), and Brave New World (Huxley), and at every instance where you feel thankful that our world is not like those in the books, remember that this is where liberals say to themselves; "too bad our world isn't like that". Liberals have even managed a form of newspeak, where diversity means conformity, equality means primacy, tolerance means intolerance, and liberal no longer means liberal, from Latin for "free", but now means something more along the lines of totalitarian fascist. Remember that whatever the libs accuse their enemies of is that of which they themselves are the most guilty. It's an old trick perfected by Lenin and taught to generations of Communist agents and their useful idiots. The only known antidote to liberal propaganda is the truth, which is why they fight so hard to control the media, for he who controls the media controls the truth." You know, EVERY SINGLE little POINT you just made...is EXACTLY what liberals think THE RIGHT WING says or thinks. They accuse the right of everything you just wrote. So where does that leave us? How about this for an idea...maybe the USA can stop being so divided and split up the middle and actually unify to defeat the evils that plague us? Wouldn't that be a little more productive? Ok Carlos, I know...I'm guilty of being a Utopianist.

Posted by: osamabinchimpin' at June 11, 2005 10:38 PM (Byu/j)

11 Osamasilly, Psst. George Orwell was a leftist. One that recognized the evil tendencies of marxist thought.

Posted by: SPQR at June 11, 2005 10:54 PM (xauGB)

12 osamabeenstupid, I won't respond to your post, because it would be like responding to a massive chili fart with a discourse on Plato; it just wouldn't do any good no matter how well worded, because farts aren't communication, they're sounds made by gas being expelled under pressure. Hot air, as it were. If you can ever rub your two neurons together and come up with something intelligent to say, you may not get used as the resident whipping boy.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 11, 2005 11:19 PM (0yYS2)

13 Minimus Phallus....the only chili fart that was ripped in this room was by you...but you're sittin' there sniffing' and saying' "Who farted?" I think you should rub your own two neuron-small testes together and come up with a real reply to a very valid point: Liberals accuse the Right of everything you said. Back up your argument, before you become the resident hypocrite.

Posted by: osamabinchimpin' at June 12, 2005 12:32 PM (Byu/j)

14 SPQR: I know Orwell was a Lefty. That book was a warning to us all.

Posted by: osamabeenvotin' at June 12, 2005 12:36 PM (Byu/j)

15 IM: I thought of you when I saw this article, hehehe: http://theonion.com/news/index.php?issue=4123

Posted by: osamabeenvotin' at June 12, 2005 01:14 PM (Byu/j)

16 Part of that newspeak includes "abortion is a right." Osama is right. The Left DOES say those same things about the Right (Bush=Hitler, etc.). But only one side can be right, and in this case, I think the liberals are wrong. Should the Left and Right we unite against the more obvious evils in the world? Perhaps, but many see the Orwellian thought IM referes to as much more insidious and thus, dangerous.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 13, 2005 11:01 AM (x+5JB)

17 YBP: Abortion! Yeah, touchy subject with many. It seems like a no-win argument to me since Liberals view not being able to choose as the government's control of a woman's body. They also feel that women will do it anyway, just less safe and illegal. Most of the Right thinks it's murder, which when it boils down is all about how you define life. Is it conception? Reflex? Movement? Having a nervous system? Pulse? Or does 2 or 4 cells alone qualify as a soul with a right to live? Is a stem cell life? If life is so important to the Right, then why does the right start so many wars? This is another Liberal accusation of the Right's hypocrisy...Bush talking about the importance of the "Culture of Life" while waging a war and being Mr. Death Row in Texas. Despite what anyone thinks in here, I'm not concrete on my view of many of these subjects. I am pro choice on abortion for a few reasons, but with a twist. I think only women should be able to vote or decide on the laws surrounding this. I also think that once a fetus has developed past a few cells and looks human, has a pulse and a developing nervous system, it is a person with a future...if the conception wasn't rape or molestation, I think it's wrong to abort. As far as which side is right? Neither. They are both wrong in my eyes. You can argue till you're blue in the face about who controls the media ex: NY-Times or MSNBC vs. FOX, etc. Maximus can have paranoid delusions about Liberals helping plan 9/11 with Osama and Liberals aiding terrorists in any way they can or the Liberals can have nightmares about the government controlling them, ruining the environment, and non-stop wars, etc. The right and the left all have polarizing opinions which I find quite unhealthy...just look at how divided the last election was and how much hate there was floating around. Is our country really two countries trapped in one? When is the last time it was unified? The only thing I do know is that I won't put myself in a little box called Right or Left. I think there are great things to draw from both, and then plenty or crap to dismiss as well. I do tend to form opinions based on logic rather than religion...for instance I think it's absurd to urge abstinence. The Pope must be insane to think that condoms aren't more important to stop AIDS in Africa, or that anyone can keep horny teenagers from fooling around. The day that all religions realize they cannot defeat nature, we will live in a better world. No religion or culture has EVER been able to keep people from having sex. Nature always finds a way, and in extreme cases (priest celibacy) the outcome can be quite nasty. I never hear about Rabbi so-and-so molesting tons of little boys. Sure, a Rabbi can screw around, but Judaism is messed up as well. I can find beef with almost any religion pretty quick. Enough of my rant...what do you think?

Posted by: osamabeenthere at June 13, 2005 12:38 PM (buka0)

18 Osama: Many right wingers are against organized religion. As a Christian, I understand that Jesus set about to set up a religion that He said He would be with intil the end of time. Even if I were not religious, I say it's best to err on the side of life--innocent life--thus destroying the argument who point out that pro-lifers should be against the death penalty too. And they should--the Church points out that it should be used sparingly. As for children born out of rape--I still see that baby as a person who deserves his right to life protected, even if the backgroung to his creation does not fit my ideal vision of how it should have come about. There has been abuse in other religions as well--Judaism, protestant, etc. And it's not because of the variuous churches, per se--it's because men in them do not listen to their teachings. But the R.C. Church is under attack the most because it is the one true Christian faith. Some older comments/arguments I made on another post: Calling abortion a "right" is a new trend. Protecting human life is not a radical new thing, but fundamental to the sanity of any civilized society. I'm positive the Founding Fathers, who discuss the God-given rights of those created by parents (and indirectly, through Him), would be aghast. Practically, 100% of a person's genetic makeup is determined at the moment of conception. Science and medicine define being a person (human) by genetic means. According to science and medicine, a fetus is a distinct organism. Thus, killing a fetus is killing a potential baby. Killing a child is killing a potential man or woman. It's killing innocent life, and that's what those who oppose abortion are against. No one is saying that babies should have "rights equal to or superior to a woman's." Pro-life proponents are simply saying that babies have a right to life. Regarding Development: Some imply that a fetus is not a thinking, feeling, conscious human being. Current, valid science indicates that a fetus is not a senseless mass of tissue, as some people have believed in the past. According to Planned Parenthood, a fetus is "the organism that develops from the embryo at the end of eight weeks of pregnancy and receives nourishment through the placenta; the fetus continues to develop until the pregnancy ends." According to Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, Tenth Edition, an organism is "an individual constituted to carry on the activities of life by means of organs separate in function but mutually dependent : a living being". In other words, Planned Parenthood admits that a fetus is an individual, and a living being. According to Dr. Ruth's Encyclopedia of Sex, "The beginning of the fetal period [is] arbitrarily designated by most embryologists to occur eight weeks after fertilization. At this time, the embryo is nearly one and one-half inches long. Few, if any, major new structures are formed thereafter; development during the fetal period of gestation consists of the maturation of structures formed during the embryonic period." In other words, the basic structure of the baby has already been formed. Planned Parenthood admits this. Now, remember, this is still within the first "trimester." The baby has a small brain. The baby can feel pain. The baby can feel vibrations. The baby has vague vision and hearing. The baby has reactions which indicate a simple intelligence. Admittedly, the baby is undeveloped enough at this point that its sensations and thoughts are not similar to adults'. However, the baby is a thinking, feeling human being. I believe that laws should support this fundamental belief. Another set of arguments against abortion would be philosophical arguments. A key philosophical question is where do you draw the line? Put another way, when does a human being become a person? The Supreme Court's decision of Roe v. Wade separated personhood from humanity. In other words, the judges argued that a developing fetus was a human (i.e., a member of the species Homo sapiens) but not a person. Since only persons are given 14th Amendment protection under the Constitution, the Court argued that abortion could be legal at certain times. This left to doctors, parents, or even other judges the responsibility of arbitrarily deciding when personhood should be awarded to human beings. The Supreme Court's cleavage of personhood and humanity made the ethical slide down society's slippery slope inevitable. Once the Court allowed people to start drawing lines, some drew them in unexpected ways and effectively opened the door for infanticide and euthanasia. Look at the situation of the poor woman in Florida, starved to death. Regardless of her thinking capabilities, SHE WAS STILL A WOMAN. The Court, in the tradition of previous line-drawers, opted for biological criteria in their definition of a "person" in Roe v. Wade. In the past, such criteria as implantation or quickening had been suggested. The Court chose the idea of viability and allowed for the possibility that states could outlaw abortions performed after a child was viable. But viability was an arbitrary criterion, and there was no biological reason why the line had to be drawn near the early stages of development. The line, for example, could be drawn much later. Ethicist Paul Ramsey frequently warned that any argument for abortion could logically be also used as an argument for infanticide. As if to illustrate this, Dr. Francis Crick, of DNA fame, demonstrated that he was less concerned about the ethics of such logical extensions and proposed a more radical definition of personhood. He suggested in the British journal Nature that if "a child were considered to be legally born when two days old, it could be examined to see whether it was an 'acceptable member of human society." Obviously this is not only an argument for abortion; it's an argument for infanticide. Other line-drawers have suggested a cultural criterion for personhood. Ashley Montagu, for example, stated, "A newborn baby is not truly human until he or she is molded by cultural influences later." Again, this is more than just an argument for abortion. It is also an argument for infanticide. More recently some line-drawers have focused on a mental criterion for personhood. Dr. Joseph Fletcher argues in his book Humanhood that "Humans without some minimum of intelligence or mental capacity are not persons, no matter how many of these organs are active, no matter how spontaneous their living processes are." This is not only an argument for abortion and infanticide; it's adequate justification for euthanasia and the potential elimination of those who do not possess a certain IQ. In other writings, Joseph Fletcher suggested that an "individual" was not truly a "person" unless he has an IQ of at least 40. There are a number of biblical arguments against abortion. But there are also medical, legal, and philosophical arguments against abortion. You asked me what I thought! Peace be to you and yours, my friend!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 13, 2005 01:03 PM (x+5JB)

19 To reply: "Even if I were not religious, I say it's best to err on the side of life--innocent life--thus destroying the argument who point out that pro-lifers should be against the death penalty too. And they should--the Church points out that it should be used sparingly." Keep in mind sometimes I state theories that aren't my own, especially in the last post comparing left and right. I'm less concerned about a killer being executed, but more concerned about innocent people in Iraq (or anywhere) being killed, and anyone would be ignorant to say that innocent people by the thousands haven't died there. "As for children born out of rape--I still see that baby as a person who deserves his right to life protected, even if the backgroung to his creation does not fit my ideal vision of how it should have come about." I can totally see your point there. I almost agree with you, only I don't think I can say how I'd really feel about it without being in the situation. I can't imagine ever having to go through a painful choice like that...but what about molestation cases? Cases where someone would be born with messed up genetics and severe birth defects? Your post had some very interesting points...but I have to say it almost seems absurd to me to separate person from human. I feel as if they are one and the same...regardless of intelligence or being in the womb. I think that someone should abort BEFORE there is a pulse, brain stem, skeletal system, etc. But then what justifies men in making this kind of decision for women?

Posted by: osamabeenthere at June 13, 2005 01:33 PM (buka0)

20 Osanma: "Cases where someone would be born with messed up genetics and severe birth defects? " But this happens in "regular" families, too. No one advocates killing these people. (Won't bring up the Nazis!) Surely the pursuit of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" applies to those born in less than desireable circumstances. "but I have to say it almost seems absurd to me to separate person from human. I feel as if they are one and the same...regardless of intelligence or being in the womb." I agree--a person is a person friom conception, my original point. Great Scott, if we killed because of a lack of intelligence, huge numbers from the beltway in D.C. would be exterminated! I believe that the battle to maintain the dignity of human life is a genderless issue. The issue transcends gender. We must have some basic laws to govern the human family, whether they are instuted by men or woman. Or we may have men questioning legislature propagated by females that impeded their perceived rights. (Can't think of the logical fallacy here...) Hey-thanks for listening!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 13, 2005 01:52 PM (x+5JB)

21 YBP, you are quite convincing, I must say. You definitely have me questioning my stances on these things. After your lasts posts, I'd have to saying I'm leaning more towards the genderless take. The only thing I still don't get is this: I'm not saying people born with genetic mutations under natural circumstances should have been aborted...I'm saying that in cases of severe molestation (the other word can't be posted in here) I can't justify a 14 year old kid having to give birth to her dad's kid. It seems completely wrong to me.

Posted by: osamabeenvotin' at June 13, 2005 03:40 PM (buka0)

22 Osamabeenvotin': Thanks, friend. I always think it's important to listen to the arguments of others. After all, we hopefully all want the Truth and want to do the right thing. As far as the fourteen year old thing, it IS tough. But two wrongs don't make a right, to use some wisdom from the mouth of babes. I would have to say that this person's sacrifice and unselfcenteredness will be rewarded in the next life. Christ tells people that his followers will suffer in this life for following Him. This may be the cross she has to bear. But this life is a drop in the bucket compared to the infinity of the next! Truth will set us free. Again, I appreciate your intellectual curiosity--something we ALL need more of, eh?

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 14, 2005 08:00 AM (x+5JB)

23 YBP: No problem...I always have an open ear & I'm glad you do too. Interesting you say "Truth" since we perceive our existence through dualities. I've often believed that our consciousness just isn't capable of knowing a mere fraction of what our universe or existence really is. Our bodies seem extremely limited in capacity to experience. Anyway, tangent. I see what you're saying, but it's hard for me to relate to since it hinges on a faith which I've never been able to believe in. Granted, I've gleaned some amazing values or truths from Christianity...but to me suffering now for a better eternal life echoes of many other religions where this was used as bait to do something horrible (9/11). I mean no insult to your faith by saying this...because that is my last intention...but since I have never been a true believer of any particular faith that results in a brick wall when trying to justify pro-choice or pro-life in religious terms on my end. It's tough in the 14 year old molested kid's case because while you want to be sympathetic to life, you also don't want to cause suffering as well.

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 14, 2005 10:58 AM (buka0)

24 Osama: Yeah, a lot of people think religion is just about faith and not reason. I disagree, which is why intellectually-honest philosophers state that one indeed can prove the existence of God, and subsequently, the the true faith He founded. But one must want the truth. Many people say they do but really don't. They are content to live in a haze of complacency. Even as a Prot, C.S. Lewis has some interesting things to say in "Mere Christianity."

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 14, 2005 12:02 PM (x+5JB)

25 I've never assumed that your opinions are based on just faith and no reason...I assure you that. Proving the existence of God is one thing, but in my mind I've pretty much deemed it impossible to prove which religion is right. Trust me, I'm not content with the "haze" and always seek truth. I've just always felt that religion was a way for people to try and explain the unexplainable. I've also think that in the past 200 years, science has illuminated our minds to many more truths than religion. I'm not content with just science though...like I said, I am open to all discussions and views. I do not conclude anything as an absolute being that I'm only in my early 30's.

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 14, 2005 12:30 PM (buka0)

26 Osamabeenwritin': "I've never assumed that your opinions are based on just faith and no reason...I assure you that." I didn't mean to imply that you did. As far as established religions, we are material beings who live in a material world (hope I don't sound like Madonna here). Because we are not completely spiritual beings, we need concrete, material things to guide us. The Second Person of the Trinity materialized to found a New Covenant (as predicted in the OT), where founded a religious body with a visible head and promised to be with it until the end of time. Even Prots with an axe to grind against Catholicism admit believe this and admit it's the R.C. Church. The Bible says seek and you shall find. If we honestly want the truth and search, it will be revealed to us. Guaranteed, Steve!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 14, 2005 01:05 PM (x+5JB)

27 Hahaha...you know what's really funny? My name isn't Steve or Steven Baber. I just used that name when I was introduced to this blog by Collin. Dammit...I can't get that Madonna song out of my head now. What have you done! A peaceful discussion has spiraled into the murky depths of 80's pop! I forgive you. I'll seek as well...no worries there.

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 14, 2005 01:38 PM (buka0)

28 Osama: I didn't really think your real name was Steve. The Madonna song? That's nothing! For real torture, what about the THEME TO "WHAT'S HAPPENING?"!!!!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 14, 2005 01:51 PM (x+5JB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Germans Let Terrorist Walk, Blame U.S.

While the U.S. detains terrorists until they are no longer considered a threat, Germany gives them lawyers, subject them to trials, and releases them based upon insufficient evidence. And when all is said and done, the German courts blame the U.S. for not providing the information necessary to convict them.

The presiding judge of the German Federal Court of Justice, Klaus Tolksdorf, announced that the verdict in the acquittal of Abdelghani Mzoudi would stand and he was now a free man. Mzoudi was accused of training at an Al-Qaeda camp in Afghanistan and paying bills of the terrorist cell in Hamburg that was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Mohammed Atta, the mastermind behind 9/11, was Mzoudi's roommate in Hamburg.

The decision by the German high court is likely a harbinger for the outcome of the appellate proceedings against Mounir El Motassadeq, a terrorist buddy of Mzoudi, who was convicted and had his verdict overturned on appeal because judges decided he didn't get a fair trial because a witness in U.S. jurisdiction was not allowed to testify.

Evidently, the German judicial system is ineffective because the U.S. is unresponsive. Of course, blaming the U.S. for every conceivable problem anywhere has become sport.

Companion post at Interested-Participant.

Posted by: Mike Pechar at 11:51 AM | Comments (4) | Add Comment
Post contains 217 words, total size 2 kb.

NEVER Call Your Pastor Back (Help me guest posters, you're my only hope!)

NOTE: Boring personal info below explaining why blogging will be light and why I need my guest-posters and collaborators to pick up the slack today.

more...

Posted by: Rusty at 10:45 AM | Comments (32) | Add Comment
Post contains 463 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Jebus bless you Rusty! You're not a "sucker" because a sucker doesn't know he's sucking. Clearly you do ;-)

Posted by: Carlos at June 10, 2005 10:49 AM (8e/V4)

2 Without even getting into Universalism... Help them out and do your good deed for the day. (But demand that six-pack after.)

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 10:50 AM (x+5JB)

3 No, donÂ’t listen to Mr. Professional....get the goods UP FRONT. "Remember if they ask to take your top off, get the money first" Actually, I sympathize with you. I too feel like the only guy who gets called to help people or the church. I guess it is ok, but sometimes I wish "others" would pick up the slack a bit. If you guest bloggers ever need guest bloggers....I am your man.

Posted by: WunderKraut at June 10, 2005 11:02 AM (4wZ+b)

4 by helping the INO types, perhaps one day they wont be INO anymore... think assimilation... resistance is futile... besides if they become non-INO, then your pastor can call THEM instead.

Posted by: Jon at June 10, 2005 11:10 AM (9tzOa)

5 Well, I guess it is kind of human nature to begrudge it a bit, but I'll tell you the same thing my wife tells me. IT'S YOUR OWN FAULT!!! By being one of the dependable ones they can always count on to volunteer if they have a need, you increase the chances of them calling, because you will do the responsible thing and actually show up, even if it's inconvenient. And you probably drive home each time saying "Never Again." Until next time they call.

Posted by: Jeremy at June 10, 2005 11:10 AM (ssh6o)

6 I applaud WunderKraut's suggestion. Nothing makes the drudgery of moving a little more bearable then having some suds before, during, and after.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 11:15 AM (x+5JB)

7 okay, i'm pickin' up the slack... This is just up your alley. Leonard Nimoy (yes, this is the official web page of the Star Trek geek) apparently likes voluptuous women... http://www.leonardnimoyphotography.com/7body.htm By the way, Rusty, if you get "fired" from your church because you just don't feel like helping out, you can always come work for us at Intertrobe. Peace out...

Posted by: Editor at June 10, 2005 11:15 AM (adpJH)

8 here is the SUN article to go along with that... http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2005260332,00.html You dirty bastards.

Posted by: Editor at June 10, 2005 11:17 AM (adpJH)

9 Editor: Hey, I just had lunch.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 11:20 AM (x+5JB)

10 Have some desert, then. I'm just finishing up my second cup of java here on the West Side.

Posted by: Editor at June 10, 2005 11:24 AM (adpJH)

11 Desert sounds good, but I hate Jello!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 11:34 AM (x+5JB)

12 Someone say Desert, as in Desert Island? Check out the latest happenings for the weekend! http://www.desertisland.cc/home/2005/06/lettin_it_ride.html

Posted by: Desert Island Boy at June 10, 2005 11:50 AM (RgSqP)

13 That dude Jebus? Is that your wacky, non-Korean Universalist Christ?

And I think yo are creating a new _INO ... Christian In Name Only ... Good luck with the Dr Pepper! /TJ PS - and yes, helping slackers move sucks ... but I agree with YBP - you can write that off as your good deed for the day/week/month.

Posted by: TJ at June 10, 2005 11:55 AM (hrK8I)

14 Clear that Nimoy image out of yer head with this. http://tbs.com/stories/story/0,,49762,00.html Only got one question. Mary Ann or Ginger??

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 12:32 PM (D3+20)

15 Howie: Referring to the old show? May Ann all the way. Ginger was to "Mae Westish." Mrs. Howell is not in the running.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 01:03 PM (x+5JB)

16 I just could not get that Nimoy thing out of my head. Old show new show any show it has got to be Mary Ann for me. But a Mike sandwich with Ginger and Mary Ann bread now that's good stuff.

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 01:11 PM (D3+20)

17 Howie: Now now. What would the little woman say? She might even forgive you for a brief fling with the Professor, but not that tart Ginger.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 01:21 PM (x+5JB)

18 Skipperrrrrrrrrr!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 01:22 PM (D3+20)

19 Editor: I was looking at the thumbnails and at first I thought they were all wearing string panties, but it turned out to be creases. EW.

Posted by: Oyster at June 10, 2005 01:24 PM (fl6E1)

20 Oyster: At least it wasn't lunchtime when you gazed on those big mammas.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 01:26 PM (x+5JB)

21 Howie: I think you're on to something. Remember how the Skipper always referred to his "little buddy"???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 01:28 PM (x+5JB)

22 You guys actually LOOKED at the pictures. You guys are sick!!!!

Posted by: Editor at June 10, 2005 01:33 PM (adpJH)

23 I admit I did, but I was seriously expecting something artistically interesting from the Spockster. Not something, er...gross.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 01:36 PM (x+5JB)

24 I always imagined Nimoy was a freak, but DAMN! Can you imagine the smell in the room? I'm guessing tuna and Limburger cheese left in a hot car for a couple of days.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 10, 2005 01:45 PM (0yYS2)

25 Yes I remember. Drop me a line to clarify if you wish.

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 01:58 PM (D3+20)

26 IM: That's truly nauseating. Now I'm REALLY going to blow my lunch... Death to the Vulcan and his perversions.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 02:39 PM (x+5JB)

27 Howie: At that wine again???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 02:40 PM (x+5JB)

28 Well no. I'm working like a dog. I have a little batch going. I think its been about two weeks. The bubbling has slowed up quite a bit, but it's no where near done yet. I'm hoping if I don't watcvh so closely it will get done quicker. A watched pot never boils. But mainly I'm trying to did out of this hole I'm in and get ahead so I can get some time to do other things. The computer Isn't cooperating with me today though and it looks like I'm going to have to put in some hours this weekend.

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 02:56 PM (D3+20)

29 Those are the kind of gals you have to roll in flour first.

Posted by: Oyster at June 10, 2005 02:57 PM (fl6E1)

30 I'm looking at it this way. By church members helping them out it shows that your church cares about them thus they may be more apt about attending church.

Posted by: Karl B at June 10, 2005 02:59 PM (xVnxW)

31 "Those are the kind of gals you have to roll in flour first." "I'm looking at it this way. By church members helping them out it shows that your church cares about them thus they may be more apt about attending church." I can see this thread has split into two directions!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 03:01 PM (x+5JB)

32 Just remember to lift with your knees. And something from Ecclesiastes about casting your bread upon the waters; it'll probably be a bit gooey later, but it'll be there.

Posted by: tee bee at June 10, 2005 05:06 PM (q1JHF)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Fatwa-Fatwa Jihad Muka-luka (PLEASE!!)

Every one is getting a damn fatwa but me! Let me make my position on Quran desecration clear. I am for it.*

Congrats to Robert Spencer for gettting the fascists over at the Islamic Thinkers Society to notice him.

If you want to see what these guys really think, I encourage you to watch the five minute video of them desecrating an American flag. Listen carefully to the words they use. (They took the video link down, but I have it if some one can host it--too long for my server).

Thanks to Mike at WunderKraut for e-mailing me about this and about Malkin's link. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 09:55 AM | Comments (11) | Add Comment
Post contains 131 words, total size 1 kb.

1 Rusty: Are you saying there's a double standard here? And American sympathizers in Middle Eastern countries can't burn the flags of those nations on their sidewalks???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 10:12 AM (x+5JB)

2 Double-standard? I don't know what you mean.......Or how about how we treat flag desecraters vs. how they treat Quran desecraters (which can get you the death penalty)

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 10, 2005 10:14 AM (JQjhA)

3 Rusty: I think we are both overreacting. The god so many worship today, The Spirit of Tolerance, would not be pleased. We need to turn ourselves in for some reprogramming in Room 101.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 10:18 AM (x+5JB)

4 Those Islamic Thinkers look pretty liberal to me...they ask readers on the newsflash on this link to "Please Bare with us" while they get the content of their site back up. http://www.islamicthinkers.com/index/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=5&Itemid=56 But this is what I might see if I bare with them...no thanks. http://roomforrant.blogspot.com/2005/05/why-they-hate-us-reason-no-1.html

Posted by: Mr. K at June 10, 2005 10:21 AM (ZfgPH)

5 For once I have to disagree with you YBP. They use this kind of crap for recruitment. To futher their war against freedom. They say "See what a bunch of idiots the Americans are, we burned their flag and they did nothing, join us". We've got to call em on it. What pisses em off is that we aren't the intended audience. They don't want us to see the truth of what they are up to.

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 10:30 AM (D3+20)

6 Howie: It's too early in the day for wine! (I was being facetious.)

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 10:37 AM (x+5JB)

7 I was hoping..

Posted by: Howie at June 10, 2005 10:38 AM (D3+20)

8 Yes... I can't believe outraged people haven't chased these clowns away.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 10:46 AM (x+5JB)

9 My computer is SO smart. I visited that link for the Islamic Thinkers site, and I got a popup from RealPlayer reading: "This clip cannot be played. It contains unexpected data and may be corrupt" Damn right it is.

Posted by: Jeremy at June 10, 2005 10:52 AM (ssh6o)

10 Rusty, there's a place that will host your file for free... www.filefront.com. You have to have an account there to upload a file, but there's no registration needed and no wait time for those downloading.

Posted by: Vonski at June 10, 2005 12:19 PM (AHaCg)

11 Rusty, We'll host it. Email me.

Posted by: Richard at June 10, 2005 12:27 PM (xFeJi)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Grace

By Demosophist

maudlin gal

The epitome of being cute and ghastly at the same time. Thank God the long national nightmare of the Jackson trial is almost over, and we can get back to more conventional sappistry.

Update--the "why" of this post: more...

Posted by: Demosophist at 08:57 AM | Comments (27) | Add Comment
Post contains 234 words, total size 2 kb.

1 huh?

Posted by: Tenfly at June 10, 2005 09:05 AM (Z2lRM)

2 I like her because she isn't a polished mannequin such as you'll find on the usual cable news fare.

Posted by: Carlos at June 10, 2005 09:18 AM (8e/V4)

3 I heard yesterday that if Jackson is convicted, he will serve time in Corcoran Prison. It's about half way between Fresno and Bakersfield, on the very hot and dry side of the San Joaquin Valley. Sirhan Sirhan and Charles Manson are both there. Roomies!

Posted by: Scott in CA at June 10, 2005 10:05 AM (di08w)

4 Can't quite see Jacko hanging out with Manson.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 10, 2005 10:20 AM (x+5JB)

5 Supposedly it's the safest of the "safe facilities" where celebrity inmates serve their time. Serial killers, mass murderers, etc. The conditions inside the prison sound WAY more luxurious than what you might expect.

Posted by: Venom at June 10, 2005 10:21 AM (dbxVM)

6 This woman creeps me out, but Greta just has a sad feel of a smart person who's been reduced to stunt-law broadcasting. The other chick is "a polished mannequin" with a bad drawl. I thought Charlie was in Folsom or at the Q, but he's since been transferred to Corcoran. Considering that he's spent about 50 of his 67 years in institutions, it shouldn't surprise me that he gets around like this. I wonder what Jacko thinks of that. The Protein Wisdom Prison Diaries should be interesting, though.

Posted by: tee bee at June 10, 2005 11:22 AM (q1JHF)

7 I hate Nancy Grace with every fiber of my being. I hate her on the subatomic level; my neutrons, protons, and electrons hate her, and if I ever get close to her, my atoms might spontaneously split and detonate. I hate her stupid cartoon character face. I hate her accent that's even worse than a fake Southern accent. I hate her clothes for being worn by her. I hate the chair she sits in and the ground she walks on. I hate the lightning for not striking her every time she goes outdoors. But do you want to know why I hate her? Because when that crazy Wilbanks chick hopped a bus to Vegas, Grace was the first to declare her poor, nervewracked, devastated boyfriend a murderer. Not only did the poor man think that his wife was abducted and possibly dead, but he was being accused of it on national television. If I was him I would have hunted Nancy down and gutted her like a fish on live television. But hey, I'm crazy like that.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 10, 2005 01:41 PM (0yYS2)

8 nancy grace is a biatch.....

Posted by: bliss at June 13, 2005 10:34 PM (Db9+P)

9 Will Nancy Grace apologize to viewers for her hateful awful one sided coverage of the Jackson trial? Does she feel guilty at all about continuously feeding us venemos hateful one sided information about this trial? I can't beleive that CNN allows this kind of irresponsible reporting. We have watched her manipulate information to create ratings for her show. It is disgusting and I hope God will forgive her when she moves on from this planet. She is clearly an awful phony delivering lies and one sided stories to try to entertain us. How pitiful...when will we petition to get her off the air before she does some real damage to someone innocent?.

Posted by: Robert at June 14, 2005 01:14 AM (SVIbT)

10 Hi, I just stumbled across this site and dont have all that much to say, but i did want to comment on how awful Nancy Grace is. I have no idea how this woman has her own show. She is annoying and arrogant. If you do not voice the SAME EXACT opinions as Nancy Grace there there is no need what so ever to appear on her show. Any guest that says anything other than her thoughts is quickly dismissed. Why the hell does she have other speakers on the show? Why doesnt she sit there in her ugly clothes and go on a rant on her own for an hour...no need for others except maybe the camera guy. I am SO glad that Michael Jackson was found innocent on all charges...of course because I believe he is innocent and a good man who is a misunderstood....but in addition to that I get to see Nancy Grace get so pissed because she was WRONG!! I love it!! She was so mean to him the entire duration of the trial. That witch was SO sure he was guilty...you would have thought she was molested by him....there was nothing that could sway her opinion. I cannot wait until her show in cancelled. God, I hope that day is really soon. Thanks!

Posted by: jennifer at June 19, 2005 02:24 PM (eAnLT)

11 For all of ya'll out there "dissin" Nancy, she's like the bad girl on a soap opera.....you just love to hate her!!! She is so passionate and compelling, you can't wait to hear what she is going to say next so you can rant and rave. Although we all don't agree with her view on issues, we can all certainly agree she is a magnetic personality that gets your attention. Personally, I love her passion for justice and am proud to see a spit fire southern gal get up there and fight for what's right. YOU GO NANCY!!!!

Posted by: Dixie at June 28, 2005 08:34 AM (LwwEF)

12 Nancy Grace is awful. Her insights and reporting is nauseating and I think she would make an excellent mistress for Fox News' Bill O'Reilly. Much like O'Reilly, when I see her face I change the channel. Her bitter, hateful twit with nothing but trite dramatic nazi psycho-babble to contribute to our world. End CNN Foxifying! Change the channel when you see Nancy Grace and do the world a favor! I change the channel when I see Nancy Grace and so should use. PS: boycott Fox

Posted by: Balin Hansen at June 30, 2005 09:09 PM (6sbwH)

13 Nancy Grace is a typical southern "lady for show" who is more concerned with presenting a morally perfect front than she is about anything else. She became a lawyer after her fiance was murdered in some sort of quest for justice, but she dropped that act without skipping a beat in favor of becoming a T.V. star. It's a good thing that she was only a mediocre attorney at best, because he is devoid of ethics. To even compare Greta Van Susteren to Tweety Bird is like comparing the Three Tenors to New Kids on the Block. One may be more your tastes, but one may also mean you are a mindless sheep impressed by shiny objects. Greta single handedly jump started the Holloway case and offers unbiased and intelligent insight into the case. Nancy's high points include stuffing her face with a sandwich to in an attempt to make a joke about her crusade against Michael Jackson and accusing the groom of the runaway bride of murder before knowing anything about the case. We should round up Grace, O'reilley, Kavuto, Tom Cruise, Bush, Paris Hilton, and Jackson and send them to fight the good fight on the front lines in Iraq. Let them spend a few months sleeping in tents, dodging hand grenades and weapons fire, and not being given basic luxuries like soap, hot food, and socks. My guess is that all would come back with a totally new outlook on the world... if they made it back alive, that is.

Posted by: J Hudson at July 01, 2005 04:32 AM (Ptor+)

14 Nancy Grace is sexy

Posted by: Anthony at July 01, 2005 02:42 PM (7/UH3)

15 All the self styled commentators should send OJ Simpson a check for establishing their careers. All had stalled careers until americas interest in trials, etc The sooner this witch gets off tv the better. It has nothing to do with her southern accent, lack of dress, moral majority phoney persona or anything else you dislike about her, it has to do with her arrogance. Not being able to return and say she is wrong on any position.

Posted by: t. hanif at July 08, 2005 05:51 PM (RFM+A)

16 Love her or hate her, Nancy Grace is definitely hot! I remember when she was much younger and was a prosecuter in Atlanta. Always wore heavy make-up, 4" stilletto heels, and what we used to call "Melrose Place" suits with short skirts. She seemed to enjoy the attention she received, and would often be seen in the company of some of Atlanta's professional black athletes.

Posted by: Atlantaman at July 18, 2005 03:38 PM (0AQzy)

17 Dear Atlantaman - Nancy Grace HOT ???? Surely you are on some heavy duty medications. There is nothing HOT about this woman. Lets do aside with the obvious, the bad clothes, the bad make-up, the bad wig and those creepy bulging eyeballs.....more importantly she has a miserable disgusting personality. She is a big phony who pretends to care about those who are in need. She uses people so she can put on her "best actress in a drama" persona every night. She is acting like she genuinely cares for people for the ratings and for no other reason at all. Nancy Grace is the farthest thing from "HOT"....Mother Theresa was a billion times "HOTTER" than Nancy Grace could ever hope to be. I hope someone muzzles her like the dog she is.

Posted by: jennifer at July 19, 2005 09:21 PM (eAnLT)

18 Nancy Grace is the farthest thing from "HOT" I thought she did a decent imitation of a "sexy." What'd you expect? If she were outright ugly there'd at least be some nobility to her lack of grace and mimicry of conscience and integrity.

Posted by: Demosophist at July 19, 2005 11:22 PM (IbWE6)

19 Have any posters here ever seen Nancy Grace in person? Undoubtedly the majority of heterosexual males would agre that from a physical appearance standpoint, the young Nancy as a prosecutor in Atlanta was a "smoking hot" lady. I have often seen her in the upscale Buckhead suburb of Atlanta turning quite a few heads. Ever witnessed her sriding through the courthouse or a shopping mall in 4'pumps? She exudes a confidence and raw sexuality whether you agree with her stances on current issues or not.

Posted by: Atlantaman at July 21, 2005 03:26 PM (0AQzy)

20 we watch nancy and greta every nite, reading some of the comments listed sounds like a lot of uneducated people talking, if someone can make this world with murderers,rapists, sex offenders and the like brought to justice everyone should be thrilled that these women bring the national attention that they do to help make the world a better place. keep up the superb work nancy and greta!now about the natalee holloway case, the possibility that she is still alive and maybe in some white slavery ring,the reward i think should help in some way for some info. if that family doesnt get some answers, I would ask the world to boycott that island until some info is found to be concrete. unfortunate for the people there to suffer the consequences of the loss of tourism but this family has suffered enough with very little answers from the aruban gov.so i say have the world back them up until this has been solved. greta and nancy tell the world to boycott aruba. and again nancy and greta keep up the good informative work.

Posted by: jfs at July 21, 2005 10:44 PM (e7x3j)

21 Dear "Atlantaman" and "jfs" - Let me address "Atlantaman" first....no, I have never seen Nancy Grace in person and I consider this a blessing. If you think she is "sexy" or "hot", well fine, suit yourself. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. My point is even though I don't personally think she is an attractive woman...her unbearable disgusting personality makes her unattractive regardless of her physical appearance. This seems to be a difficult concept for you to grasp. I'll keep my fingers crossed for you that Playboy finally comes to their senses and calls Nancy to pose for the centerfold. I'd imagine that Nancy will be getting that phone call from Playboy ANY DAY now........ Now as for you "jfs" how pleasant of you to call us all uneducated. I am more than sure your degree from Yale is hanging on the wall behind you. Yes...murderers, rapists, sex offenders should be brought to justice....but gee "jfs" don't you think that should be left to...ohhh lets say...the Police, the FBI, and the CIA and perhaps the Courts ??? No, no "jfs" lets have Nancy Grace tell us what is going on. Surely she knows. She has a magical crystal ball that tells her EXACTLY what happened to every missing or murdered person. I don't think you understand the problem that the majority of the people on this message board have with Nancy Grace. Let me sum it up for you........it is all BLACK and WHITE with Nancy Grace. There is no in between. Its Nancy's opinion and NO ONE elses. She could give a shit less what anyone else has to say. If she believes someone is guilty of a crime, there is NO changing her mind. EVEN if they PROVE that person is INNOCENT she will not change her opinion or say she was wrong. When she gets on one of her hick rants and someone tries to interject or disagree they are immediately dismissed by Nancy. Nancy NEEDS the to be in the spotlight. In all reality she DOESN'T care half as much about these missing people as she leads us to believe on her show. It is all about the ratings. Perhaps at one point in her life she cared, but trust me, she doesn't care that much anymore. When those cameras stop rolling so do Nancy's fake tears. She is a phony. There are hundreds of news channels and newscasters who keep the public informed on all the evil things that happen in this world....I want the story, not some hick bitch to shove her opinions down my throat. You know what else "jfs" ??? Sometimes we the people rely just a little to much on the media. Don't believe everything you hear......just cause you read it in the paper or see it on the news....doesn't always make it true or accurate information. On another note let me just touch upon the Natalee Holloway case. Yes, it is very very sad that she is missing....and I hope to god she is found alive and well. BUT there are THOUSANDS UPON THOUSANDS of missing people in this world....do they get all the coverage that this girl has gotten? NO. Why? Because they are not all pretty, blonde 18 year olds. If we were dealing with an 80 year old fat man with liver spots and nose hair do you think Nancy Grace and all the news channels would be pleading day in and day out for the recovery of him? NOT A CHANCE IN HELL....and why should we boycott ARUBA because of the possibility of ONE or TWO or a FEW bad people? It has been a MONTH since this girl has been missing......there are people who have been missing for DECADES !!! Do you expect the Aruba police and government to come up with immediate answers??? Why don't we just go ahead and boycott EVERYWHERE???? There are unsolved mysteries of this nature EVERYWHERE!!! Based on your theory "jfs" we are boycotting THE WORLD........stop listening to that bitch Nancy Grace she is filling your head with bullshit. Draw your own conclusions. I believe it is you "jfs" who is the uneducated one.

Posted by: jennifer at July 22, 2005 12:37 AM (eAnLT)

22 jfs: we watch nancy and greta every nite, reading some of the comments listed sounds like a lot of uneducated people talking, if someone can make this world with murderers,rapists, Neglected capitalization, run-on sentences, inappropriate punctuation, not to mention bad and idiosyncratic spelling... You must've acquired your education by watching Nancy Grace and Greta Van Susteren, and similar sensationalist TV fare. My point was that these women distort the worldviews of the people who watch them (as well as pushing out good reporting with bad) and you've helped me make it. Thanks.

Posted by: Demosophist at July 22, 2005 10:56 AM (IbWE6)

23 Nancy Grace, 47, commentator for Court TV. A Â“Victim of a violent crimeÂ” THE DOCUMENTED STORY OF THAT CRIME The Murder of Keith Griffin. What has she told us about what happened that violent day? In searching through interviews, magazine and newspaper articles here is what she has said. Then there are the documented facts gleaned from interviews with Jurors, Attorneys, Judge, Witnesses and newspapers in the area. First the date, she has said at various times, it happened in 1987, 1985, 1982 and 1980. You would think a date that according to Ms. Grace Â“changed her life foreverÂ” would be burned into her soul. A seminal event! The date was August 6, 1979 . She said it happened in a remote wilderness. It was on the entrance road to the Georgia Kraft Plywood Co. and US Hwy. 278, 1 Ã‚Â½ miles from downtown Madison Ga. She said her boyfriend did not know his assailant. They were friends, work for the same construction Co. In fact the prosecutor at trail based part of his case on the assailant killing a friend. She said her boyfriend was 25. He was 23. She said the assailant was 25. He was 19, Said assailant was on parole He was not. Said he had a record. He did not. Said it was a murder for profit. It was not. The man was out for revenge after being fired from his job at the construction Co. Said her boyfriend was driving a jeep, It was a Bronco that belonged to the Construction Co. Said it was robbery. It was not. Said they found KeithÂ’s wallet with $35.00 and her picture in McCoyÂ’s home No wallet was found in his home. Just the 38 cal. revolver Ser# 33866 . (GriffinÂ’s wallet was found several days after the incident in the Bronco, by Eli Ingram,) Said it was a mugging. It was not. Said it was random. It was not. Said he was still alive when he arrived at the hospital. He was pronounced dead at the scene . Said she was asked by Joe Briley the District Attorney if he should seek the death penalty. Grace said she told him No and has regretted it ever since. (If that were true you would think Briley would have asked GriffinÂ’s parents. rather than a 21 yr. old kid) . The State did ask for the Death Penalty. The jury voted against it. She said she testified at the trial. Two Jurors, a Bailiff, a Defense attorney a Court Reporter and Judge do not remember any Â“white girl testifyingÂ”. (The transcripts were destroyed in a fire.) . The Defendant never looked at her. The accused stared at the floor during the entire trial. In fact he never spoke a word to his lawyer or anybody before, during or after the trial. (One exception)* She said McCoyÂ’s defense was Â“didnÂ’t do it, you got the wrong guy The truth is... there was never a doubt by anyone he did the crime (there is a confession) The defense was insanity. Said the Jury was out 3 days . Jury was out 5 hrs. She said there were many appeals. There were none Says she is 44 years old .She is 47. Documented narrative of what really happen August 6, 1979. Keith Griffin 23, from Athens GA. and Tommy McCoy 19, an illiterate, mentally challenge Blackman, worked together for the Ingham Construction Co. on the Georgia Kraft Plywood Co. site outside Madison Ga. McCoy was fired and was out for revenge. On Monday the 6th of August Mccoy left his house with a 38 cal. Revolver stashed in a brown paper bag. Keith Griffin had taken the company Bronco to town to pick up lunch. Returning to Kraft he saw McCoy walking down the Company road at the intersection of US Hwy. 278. Griffin stopped either to talk or to give a ride to McCoy. It is not clear which. McCoy fired six shots at point blank range, five of which found their mark... McCoy then dumped the body in the back seat and in his rush, drove the Bronco in a ditch. Joe Brown, a maintenance worker for the plant drove by in his truck and not knowing what had happed offered to help McCoy. He refused. Brown drove a few yards decided to return. He told McCoy he would take him to the hospital because of all the blood on his shirt. The assailant then jumped in the passenger side of BrownÂ’s truck, put the gun in the f ace of the Maintenance worker and pulled the trigger twice, ( At trial he said the gun looked like a Â“stove pipeÂ”) The gun was empty, Brown ran and McCoy took of in his truck.. Minutes later friends of BrownÂ’s showed up and said they saw the truck and knew where it was. It was parked in McCoyÂ’s driveway. He was arrested a few minutes later with the gun in his possession. Keith Griffin was pronounced dead at the scene. Tommy got a lawyer, a good one, Billy Prior. According to Prior, McCoy never said a word to him before, during or after the trail. (One exception)*. During the entire 1 Ã‚Â½ day trail the defendant stared at the floor without moving. Prior did a magnificent job explaining the psychiatric reports and mental history of the retarded defendant. McCoy had been judged Â“mildly retardedÂ” by the Ga. Central State Hospital. (By the way, no one remembers a Â“white girlÂ” testifying.) It worked! The jury turned down the death penalty. When the Jury came back and announced they would not render a death penalty verdict. McCoy turned to his lawyer and uttered his only words. Â“Does that mean IÂ’m gonna liveÂ”?* Tommy McCoy, GDC ID: 0000400964 was convicted of murder, aggravated assault (Brown) and found not guilty of robbery. He was sentence to life, with possibility of parole. He is in his 26th year at the Hancock State Prison at Sparta Ga, Sources: Interviews with two Jurors, Judge, Attorneys, Court Reporter, the Bailiff. Court and documents, Larry King Live., New Republic, Atlanta Journal, the Madisonian and Macon Telegraph. Newspapers. Interview Sources and Documents Interviewed Bill Scholly, Investigator, Buckhead Ga. williamscholly@bellsouth.net Bill Prior, Attorney for Mccoy. Madison Ga. Joe Briley, District Attorney. Madison Ga. Columbus Johnson. Sheriff. Madison Ga. Don and Eli Ingram, Ingram Construction Co. Madison GA. Hugh Thompson, Judge. Madison Ga. Roy Dobbs, Jury Foreman. Madison Ga. Alonzo Farmer, Juror. Madison Ga. Joe Brown, Second Victim. Madison Ga. Janet Wilkerson, Court Reporter. Milledgeville Ga. Sentencing Documents. (Available on request) Notice to suppress evidence. (Available on request)) MccoyÂ’s Personal History. (Available on request) Jury Instructions. (Available on request)

Posted by: gaby8 at August 10, 2005 12:41 PM (vsUd1)

24 You care too much about the details of someone elses life. Nancy suffered a tragedy...period. Why do you spend so much time dismantling her account of the details. Do you miss Keith? Did you lose someone that you love? Get a life! Give the woman a break.

Posted by: Dee at August 10, 2005 10:19 PM (ywZa8)

25 Dear Dee, I do believe you are missing the point of gaby8's last post. If she can not even keep accurate information of something this close and personal to her, how can we possibly depend on any of the other information she gives the public? She twists the facts. Why? I have no idea...but it is scary that she has her own show where she can distort information to thousands of people every day.

Posted by: Jennifer at August 12, 2005 12:22 AM (eAnLT)

26 Nancy Grace latest. Fathers beware! Nancy Grace: Aired September 12, 2005 - 20:00:00 ET GALLADORO: I`ve talked -- I`ve talked to my parish priest. And he`s asked me not to think of those last moments, to think of where he is now. My father was -- my father was just a great man. And I know he`s in heaven. And I know he`s being taken care of much better than he was taken care of a week ago. And that`s what I try to take solace in. GRACE: Well, Mr. Galladoro, I know your father had one thing that many people will never have, and that is a son that loved him.

Posted by: gaby8 at September 13, 2005 03:46 AM (osEYO)

27 Nancy Grace as a resource for fact. Not likely. As a prosecutor per : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Grace Grace compiled a perfect record of nearly 100 felony convictions at trial and no losses Grace's perfect conviction record at trial did not survive the successful appeal of several cases, and her professional ethics have at times also been called into question by higher courts Grace has recently received strong criticism for her public comments about trials involving Michael Jackson and Elizabeth Smart. Some claim that Grace's tendency to declare the guilt of an accused individual before trial subverts one of the fundamental principles of the criminal justice system. Others point out the inappropriate nature of making public comments about pending criminal proceedings. The most startling example of Grace commenting on matters sub judice occurred in the Smart case, when suspect Richard Ricci was arrested by police on the basis that he had a criminal record and had worked on the Smart's home. Grace immediately and repeatedly proclaimed on Court TV and CNN's Larry King that Ricci "was guilty", although there was little if any evidence to support this claim. She also suggested publicly that Ricci's girlfriend was involved in the coverup of his alleged crime. Grace continued Months later it was revealed that Smart was kidnapped by Brian David Mitchell and Wanda Barzee, two individuals with whom Richard Ricci and his girlfriend had no connection. Grace never publicly apologized to Ricci's family, and continued to defend her assumption that he was involved in the kidnapping of Elizabeth Smart. Could it possibly be that NG has taken control of BHT search for NH because she decided someone was guilty again? In fact admonished three times for failing in ethics of prosecution. How many times did she get away with it ? http://www.law.com/article.jsp.htm Nancy Grace, the host of a self-titled legal show on CNN Headline News, "played fast and loose" with her ethical duties as a Fulton County, Ga., prosecutor in 1990, a federal appeals panel has declared. etc. etc. And NG has a ego as big as her self imposed nickname - Amazin' Grace. as per http://au.dir.yahoo.com/News_and_Media/Television/Personalities/Grace__Nancy/ Her record really is not that amazing considering the above. Since NG has taken over the conviction in the NH "case" she appears to have taken over BHT. Is Nancy playing "fast and loose" with BHT and NH to get better ratings than Fox and O'Reilly ? IS NG going to apologize for false accusations made by herself or by NHT at her behest ? The ostensible purpose of NG's many diatribes as well as this blog is to "find where Natalee Holloway is" and/or to "assist in the investigation". I disrespectfully submit that NG and this blog have not accomplished the stated end but have succeeded in making it impossible for a prosecutor to wade through the dowsings of truth to find a fact if any exist. etc. http://wampum.wabanaki.net/archives/001773.html http://www.truthinjustice.org/carr.htm http://injusticeanywhere.blogspot.com/2005/04/bad-nancy.html http://federalism.typepad.com/crime_federalism/2005/05/but_it_boosted_.html

Posted by: Bryan at September 14, 2005 02:33 PM (6krEN)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

June 09, 2005

AI Gets One Right: Report on Human Rights and the Blogosphere

Ok, surfing around the Amnesty International website I came across this: Press Freedom Day: Human rights in the Blogosphere. It's good to know that between their idiotic Chomsky inpired anti-Americanisms that they have some concern about bloggers getting locked up in countries where real human rights abuses are commonplace. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:14 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 668 words, total size 4 kb.

BIG Media FINALLY Givin' Me R-E-S-P-E-C-T

Man, it's not every day that you get mentioned in The Lodi News Sentinel! I have finally made it. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 03:41 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 65 words, total size 1 kb.

Amnesty International Calls for Arrest of Bush, Bono to be named Czar of World

I used to belong to Amnesty International. No joke. During my lunch break in high school I would sit under a big U2 poster writing letters to South Africa begging the release of this or that jailed activist. But not now, oh no, not now.

First the leader of Amnesty makes the disgusting and immoral comparison of Camp X-Ray to Soviet gulags (which I debunked here), next they decide to call on Noam Chomsky of all people to defend their position (check out the video link on the right of the page), and now John Leo (Via Mighty Righty who got it from Captain Ed with a big hat tip to Filthy Allah) notices something I had forgot: this is the same group that wishes the Zeropeans to nab top officials and try them for crimes against humanity.

Man, am I glad I let my membership dues go unpaid for so long.........I'm totally on for the The Bipartisan Anti-Inflammation Pledge of 2005, but I reserve the right to call people I disagree with 'ca-ca heads' at will!! Seriously, some words are bad, but others are fighting words.

Anyway, here is what AI says (via Captain Ed again). It's not exactly a call for kidnapping, as Ed kinda makes it out to be, but it is the type of hyperbole that makes these guys look like the fools they are: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 03:25 PM | Comments (9) | Add Comment
Post contains 351 words, total size 3 kb.

1 Not Grand Moff Tarkin of the World???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 09, 2005 03:29 PM (x+5JB)

2 I am for slapping amnesty members in the nuts when ever possible.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at June 09, 2005 03:35 PM (yBHNA)

3 Heh. I used to just throw those AI flyers in the U2 album cases in the trash. Sucker.

Posted by: Editor at June 09, 2005 03:47 PM (adpJH)

4 Bono the clown. Him and his fellow "concerned" artists are like broken records with their crap. If he's so concerned about the world and Africa, why doesn't he give up his cash, go to a place like Ethiopia and help them out? Nah, the limelight is much more important than actually getting dirty or anything. As for AI, isn't that an acronym for something else as well? They have lost all credibility with their rants. Everyone now knows where they stand. Nonpartisan my ass.

Posted by: MrAnd at June 09, 2005 04:05 PM (Y77zF)

5 Can you see that headline? George Bush Arrested in French Riviera, Precision Missle Strike Creates New Parking Lot for Euro-Disney in the Area Formally Known as Paris.

Posted by: Jeremy at June 09, 2005 04:09 PM (ssh6o)

6 MrAnd: How the heck can he do all that? He's got to tend to his castle???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 09, 2005 05:27 PM (C0pBN)

7 Next Earth Day I'm gonna slap a hippy even if it means spending the night in jail.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 09, 2005 08:20 PM (0yYS2)

8 Someone at National Review has a law named for them, 'any organization not explicitly right wing will become left wing over time' (I'll add - especially if money is involved). I think that is what happened to Amnesty International. I think it's time to start a new AI, this time explicitly right wing (ie pro-freedom across the board, not just for dictators). AI is a good idea, too bad they didn't just stick to it.

Posted by: Jabba the Tutt at June 10, 2005 07:40 AM (C8mO2)

9 It must take a lot of time and energy for you people to hate so much. Imagine what positive things you could do for the world if you weren't so busy sitting on your computer bashing organizations that work very hard to help people. You should be ashamed of yourselves.

Posted by: Hippy Chick at September 24, 2005 10:22 PM (f6rSp)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Italian Hostage in Afghanistan Freed

Clementina Cantoni, the CARE International aid worker being held by Taliban terrorists in Afghanistan since May 3oth has been released. Our earlier post about Clementina Cantoni is here. Thank God she did not meet the same fate as CARE International worker in Iraq, Margaret Hassan.

The Guardian: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 02:36 PM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 226 words, total size 2 kb.

Hostage Jeffrey Ake Safe in Iraq?

The Jawa Report is suddenty getting a number of hits for people looking for news about American hostage in Iraq, Jeffrey Ake. Our earlier reports about Jeffrey Ake are here (news of the abduction along with silence from the State Department) and here (video released). As with the other hostages being held in Iraq, such as Roy Hallums, we pray that Mr. Ake is alright and that his captors meet a swift and gruesome end at the hands of a very pissed off Marine.

A few days ago a rumor began to circulate that Jeffrey Ake had been released and was in Iraq. Perhaps similar rumors are circulating today? Let's hope this time the rumor turns out to be true. Any one with news about the status of Jeffrey Ake is urged to e-mail me.

Here is a story that ran a few days ago about Jeffrey Ake from the La Porte County Herald Argus: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 02:21 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 303 words, total size 2 kb.

E-mail an al Qaeda Fan! (Updated with more e-mails)

Chad Evans has found an al Qaeda support group masquerading as an X-Box club. The best part is he churns up this e-mail address for one of the members who also runs a little Yahoo Group of jihadi supporters. How about signing him up for the pork product daily e-mail list?

UPDATE: One of our friends who wishes to remain anonymous does some digging and comes up with the following e-mails for members of the al Qaeda Yahoo group:

abo0jehad@yahoo.com
kashmirmujahideen@yahoo.com
mahmood_aljaboori@yahoo.com
mullahxxx@yahoo.it
tamim7007@yahoo.com
fasadalsaud@hotmail.com
alqa3edaah@yahoogroups.com

Try to keep track of who you e-mail. Filthy Allah has been going back and forth with one particular vile piece of scum lately and for the likes of us we can't figure out which terrorist supporting organization he belongs to.

Posted by: Rusty at 02:14 PM | Comments (52) | Add Comment
Post contains 145 words, total size 1 kb.

US Led NATO to Save Muslims from Mass Starvation (once again, but don't expect any credit)

It looks like US led NATO forces will finally begin to do something about the mass-starvation induced by Islamist militants in the Sudan's Darfur region. It's been way too long in the making, and let's hope whatever planning needs to be done gets done quick. Children in the region are dying today thanks to the relentless onslought of Islamist militia forces and their supporters in Khartoom.

Do you think the US or its European allies will get credit for, once again, coming to the aid of Muslims? Don't hold your breath. Expect the reaction from the Islamic world to be a) too little too late. The US let tens of thousands of Muslims die (ignoring the fact that they died as a result of other Muslims actions) b) the US is once again invading a Muslim country in a Zionist inspired crusade (remember, it was the 'victory' over US forces trying to end mass-starvation in Somalia that inspired Osama bin Laden to take his war against us up a nocth).

The Dread Pundit Bluto asks if this signals the end to the UN since NATO seems to be doing pretty much all of what the UN was supposed to be doing.

Here is the press-release: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 12:42 PM | Comments (12) | Add Comment
Post contains 497 words, total size 3 kb.

1 The very fact that we continue to do operations that aid Muslims, as well as non Muslims equally, speaks volumes to the charge that the west is on a crusade to once again attack the Muslims. however I do not expect them to see it that way.

Posted by: dave at June 09, 2005 12:51 PM (fsJ2z)

2 I'm skeptical still. Hate to say it, but Canada announced a 100 personnel force to go to Sudan late last month. About 20 of that force would be used as security purposes. Some members of Parliament were not happy however, demanding a 1000 personnel force. Anyways, this mission was rejected by the Sudanese government saying that they will only accept AU forces in the area and aren't interested in any help from non AU countries. Apparently, Canada's decision was made without consulting Sudan. It's also kind of sad considering the Sudanese government funds the very militia that is doing the killings, yet they don't want the help. Anyways, I'll believe all of this when it actually happens.

Posted by: Tenfly at June 09, 2005 01:12 PM (Z2lRM)

3 For now, the mission seems to be limited to flights in and out of the mission, but I too will take a wait and see attitude.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 09, 2005 01:38 PM (JQjhA)

4 Oh jeeze! Does this mean we're going to be inundated with rolling pictures of Starvin' Marvin, again? And Geldof is getting involved with Africa, again, too? What is this - 1984 all over again?

Posted by: Editor at June 09, 2005 01:48 PM (adpJH)

5 Yes. As for the "NATO's going into Sudan to help Muslims again" comment, this implies that NATO has done this before - which it didn't. Bombing the Serbs 10 years ago was done primarily to keep Turkey and Greece from fighting each other (which they would have, if the situation had gotten even more out of control), not to "help the Muslim Kosovars." The fact that the KLA (which received a fair bit of western "aid") was populated by the same kind of Islamic fascist villainy that the GWOT is trying to stamp out these days is, in a word, ironic. Helping the Muslims of Kosovo was secondary, played up by the "genocide" which, these days, appears to have been another crock of shit beefed up with stellar intelligence gathering. Should NATO help in Sudan? I don't think so. NATO's a defence force, not a humanitarian one. Let the UN do this.

Posted by: Venom at June 09, 2005 02:07 PM (dbxVM)

6 Maybe I'm being simplistic here, but what is the UN doing? They set up refugee camps and hold "talks". They do a little hand wringing followed by more "talks". They air drop a few bags of rice and some penicillin and talk some more. The refugee camps are attacked and more die. UN Agencies are expelled and the killing and the starvation just keeps going on. Is this what you're suggesting? More of the same?

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 02:49 PM (fl6E1)

7 I'm suggesting using an organization that has a history of delivering humanitarian aid to those who need it, not an organization that has no such experience.

Posted by: Venom at June 09, 2005 03:09 PM (dbxVM)

8 I agree, but seriously, why is it - even when there is help - it's constantly too late? Rwanda? Sudan? Pick up the pace.

Posted by: Tenfly at June 09, 2005 03:09 PM (Z2lRM)

9 Again I'm going to be simplistic. The.aid.isn't.working. The.talks.aren't.working. How many years of this are we going on now? Couldn't they work in conjunction? One to enforce order and the other to deliver aid so that it's effective and getting into the right hands?

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 03:22 PM (fl6E1)

10 "Couldn't they work in conjunction? One to enforce order and the other to deliver aid so that it's effective and getting into the right hands?" Maybe, but the UN does have its peacekeeping force - which, before you completely rip it to pieces, was actually pretty effective up until maybe 10 or 15 years ago. Like Iraq, you only hear the bad side of it. They do a lot of good in hostile environments. Also, give the UN a little bit more flexibility to defend itself in hostile situations. Rwanda occurred because too many people at the top were trying to handle the situation with one hand tied around their balls. Bosnia wasn't really much different. I still think the UN, being more of a humanitarian organization than NATO, is better suited for this kind of mission. NATO's a military powerhouse, but I doubt they're that adept at knowing how to distribute food/medicine aid. The only way you'd get the two coordinated is if the UN was in charge, and I doubt that would be a popular move with a lot of people.

Posted by: Venom at June 09, 2005 03:45 PM (dbxVM)

11 All too often though the UN peacekeepers carry guns but they're not allowed to use them. Whether or not it's a popular move shouldn't matter. It never has before. I'm not entirely dissing the UN. They have some pretty serious problems and I'm quite critical of them for those things, but I'm not unreasonable. However, their bureacracy has gotten pretty bad when it comes to distributing aid and it often takes quite a while before they get in motion. Look how long it took them to react to the tsunami in the southeast. And then they criticized other countries for showing them up. Well, it needed to happen fast and they were dragging their feet. My point is exactly what you brought up. It worked up until 10 or 15 years ago. How much longer does it have to not work? I'm not arguing that I think NATO is a better alternative because I'm not convinced of that either.

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 04:30 PM (fl6E1)

12 Venom, actually we learned from the Indonesian tsunami that the UN is best suited for watching others distribute aid while the UN takes credit for their work.

Posted by: SPQR at June 10, 2005 02:33 AM (xauGB)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Office Space, the next Rocky Horror Picture Show?

Let the pop-culture theme continue! Professor Chaos has the details. But does one dress up as Samir Nagheenanajar or Bill Lumbergh? And do you throw Swinglines at the screen, or what?

Posted by: Rusty at 12:02 PM | Comments (26) | Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.

Angelina Jolie's Hot Lesbian Sex Expertise

In an ongoing series of posts designed to support anti-dhimmitude as well as give concrete examples of 'good gay', The Jawa Report presents the following from 'good gay' goddess Angelina Jolie via the Imperial Minister of Pop Culture studies Ghost of a Flea. Warning: Extremely PG-13 material follows. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 11:43 AM | Comments (29) | Add Comment
Post contains 377 words, total size 3 kb.

1 And why is this subject posted in here? Rusty! Are feeling inadequate!? hehe...Just kidding. I will give my 2 cents: I've had some bisexual or self-professed "lesbian" lovers who taught me a nice thing or two which every straight girl after them has benefited from, so I can't diss them except for the latter being in denial about their silly sexual identity issues. (calling yourself lesbian and fucking a guy repeatedly) Anyway, Angelina isn't even 30, so nuggets of wisdom from her don't mean squat to me. I also can't take anyone seriously if they are keeping vials of blood around their neck and porking Billy Bob Thornton.

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 09, 2005 12:01 PM (B9hEP)

2 Dude, it's the THOUGHT of 'good gay' Jolie that inspired the post....not the advice.......

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 09, 2005 12:03 PM (JQjhA)

3 You know, just the thought of Jolie, and the subject matter I'm almost not caring what inspired the post!

Posted by: dave at June 09, 2005 12:05 PM (fsJ2z)

4 I'd do her.

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 12:09 PM (fl6E1)

5 I would not kick her out of my tent.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at June 09, 2005 12:19 PM (yBHNA)

6 "Good Gay" Sounds like a bullshit label to me. Oyster...you better wear 2 condoms and cover the rest of you with saran wrap: She's been around the block so many times that she's practically playing soccer with her labia.

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 09, 2005 12:22 PM (B9hEP)

7 Aww, don't pick on Billy Bob! He did it for the nookie!

I think he's sorta cute.

Posted by: Princess Kimberley at June 09, 2005 12:56 PM (EhIMT)

8 Princess, I gotta pick on Billy B...he bagged Angelina AND got hot and heavy with Halle. Let a man be jealous! Hehe...

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 09, 2005 01:36 PM (B9hEP)

9 Oh sure, you HAD to throw in that scree shot from Gia, di'n't you?! How am I supposed to finish my lunch?

Posted by: Editor at June 09, 2005 01:43 PM (adpJH)

10 so I can't diss them except for the latter being in denial about their silly sexual identity issues. (calling yourself lesbian and fucking a guy repeatedly) If it wasn't for silly sexual identity issues I would never get to have sex with lesbians. I, for one, thank our silly sexual identity overlords.

Posted by: Flea at June 09, 2005 02:19 PM (0rSfc)

11 Jolie deprived us "lesbians trapped in male bodies" from beneficial tips? Selfish bitch.

Posted by: Aaron's cc: at June 09, 2005 02:58 PM (ov6Vw)

12 Flea, I wasn't really complaining. About 5 years ago I had a whole bunch of "lesbian" lovers who were all friends. I was hooking up with all of them and each one was like, "Don't tell anyone" this and that. It was insanely funny that they were so afraid of their lesbian friends finding out we were hooking up, yet ALL the friends were doing it. It was a fun fling, but I had to move on to women that have no guilt about doin' the nasty.

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 09, 2005 06:26 PM (B9hEP)

13 Mental picture for you: Angelina Jolie dressed in her Lara Croft outfit, and Elizabeth Hurley in her Satanic cheerleader costumer from Bedazzled. Together. Touching. Each other. Grrrrr...

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 09, 2005 08:24 PM (0yYS2)

14 Argh...

Posted by: osamabinchimpin' at June 09, 2005 09:37 PM (B9hEP)

15 Sure, Angelina is hot. But that woman is seriously mass murdering stalker crazy. You remember Glenn Close in Fatal Attraction? Angelina would be like 1000 X crazier. Dead rabbits? Angelina would do your children dead in the pot.

Posted by: SPQR at June 10, 2005 02:37 AM (xauGB)

16 hi ilove angelina joli veuife

Posted by: mezoo at June 30, 2005 02:36 PM (8wds3)

17 I think that thinking of Angelina Jolie and another hott woman together is enough to turn any female at least bi, I mean Angelina is so fine! Who wouldn't want to be with her. Who cares who she's been with. At least you could say she'd been with you!

Posted by: melissa at June 30, 2005 08:57 PM (pO1tP)

18 aj is soooo hot cant get enough aj she can turn a straight woman gay Mmmmmmmm

Posted by: mrg at July 01, 2005 05:22 PM (d2zLn)

19 Angelina is so sexy I want to do her in the worst way. I am straight but she is the only girl I would do it with. She just is so hot she makes me hot and wet. I think she just made me bi. I would do her in a quick minute and anyone who wouldnt is hating or lying

Posted by: jasmine at July 06, 2005 10:03 PM (USugG)

20 o-ea87e36d43c360bc6bdec430a2feb8cd-o Very good work, nice webpage.

Posted by: Lewis Flanders at July 08, 2005 02:55 PM (K/gpw)

21 love 2 lickie with jolie! she has made me think of going bi too! @f she saw my fine 'culo' she would drop Brad fast n furious!

Posted by: susana at July 08, 2005 06:17 PM (DpJL0)

22 love 2 lickie with jolie! she has made me think of going bi too! if she saw my fine 'culo' she would drop Brad fast n furious!

Posted by: susana at July 08, 2005 06:17 PM (DpJL0)

23 i like to have a gift from angelina jolie.

Posted by: ali at July 10, 2005 03:05 AM (JoW9O)

24 you guys are crazy... yer, seriously, use are living inn dreams, none of use actually know angelina... use cant just judge her for what she looks like, think of all the great things she does for those kids and stuff.... dont just judge her for her looks, she has done stupid things liike thinking to commit suicide but who doesnt these days....

Posted by: Tiffany at July 17, 2005 03:38 PM (/vBSN)

25 Um ok Tiff... Let's see here. She thought like that before hand. We all go through hard times in our lives. That was her's. Besides you don't live in the past, and that was the past. She said that since adopting Maddox she has become a different person. I believe that she really has. She has become a better person and nowadays wouldn't think of commiting suicide. So, you really haven't got much to say. Besides, you can't tell me you have never judged a person on looks before, we all have. We all have had those thoughts go through our heads about someone at sometime in our lives.

Posted by: Melissa at July 24, 2005 08:21 PM (M7kiy)

26 I have Angolia, She real bitch. Steals husband of others. she's two faces woman,dangerous, has sucking lips. the more she suck the more it gets bigger. after having sucked Pitt seems like 2 times bigger now. May her got HIV.

Posted by: LittlePle at August 02, 2005 09:41 AM (Ub2HS)

27 I hate Angolia,what she's done is so didgusting. She's real bitch. Steals husband of others. she's two faces woman,dangerous, has sucking lips. the more she suck the more it gets bigger. after having sucked Pitt seems like 2 times bigger now. May her got HIV.

Posted by: LittlePle at August 02, 2005 09:42 AM (Ub2HS)

28 hi i love you. Please send your picher for me tanks for attenshen

Posted by: bahram at September 01, 2005 01:01 PM (WDyE4)

29 ei! wazzup dude?? hows u doing??? Stay cool> jolie..........

Posted by: twink at November 02, 2005 12:13 AM (qe7G2)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Marines Detain 16 American Security Contractors in Iraq

Marines in Fallujah are now reporting an odd incident in which 16 American and 3 Iraqi security contractors were detained for firing at US soldiers and Iraqi defense forces last month. Some may jump to the conclusion that this is evidence of a 'shoot first, ask questions later' mentality among these paramilitary forces, but I would caution against that. Friendly fire incidents are very common in combat situations (think back to Pat Tillman), especially in places like Fallujah that have been hotbeds of terrorist activity in the past.

Still, the fact that the Marines detained the men for some time does indicate that they were, at the very least, royally pissed at getting shot at by Americans. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 10:08 AM | Comments (10) | Add Comment
Post contains 366 words, total size 2 kb.

1 I too would be royally pissed. I think I'd understand that it happens, but still, I'd be royally pissed.

Posted by: tyler at June 09, 2005 10:13 AM (Y9Lwb)

2 This clearly does not support Lefty claims that our GIs are "targeting" journalists-- not that anything usually supports Lefty claims.

Posted by: Carlos at June 09, 2005 10:15 AM (8e/V4)

3 I can't wait to hear the details of this incident. It should be interesting since I can't imagine how anyone could confuse Marines with Joe Jihadi.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 09, 2005 10:48 AM (0yYS2)

4 The account you report seems different than the report from In The Dark : http://rujournalism.blogspot.com/2005/06/us-marines-beat-us-mercenaries-in-iraq.html

Posted by: Avary at June 09, 2005 03:08 PM (75qFN)

5 Seems to me that its coming to a bad day for America when some misfits whose names cant be pronounced in english, accuse our marines in Iraq of lying and making up a story about being shot at.I honestly believe that our Marines, who are risking their lives everyday for someone elses worthless country, while ours is being taken over by their kind, fully know and understand the difference between a gunshot and a shovel and the direction from which it came. Cmon "jack". Get behind America and her troops or go home where you belong.

Posted by: bill blue at June 10, 2005 10:08 PM (crwmM)

6 Dont know what type of camel skin or pork rind they write the quran on, but Ive heard it dont make good --- wipe.

Posted by: bill blue at June 10, 2005 10:41 PM (crwmM)

7 I think that these contractors should be held responsable just like any other American serving in that country. Those contractors run around that country knowing that they are not going to be held to any fire for whatever they do! That is why there are incidents like this one. I am in full understanding that you must do what you can to survive, but to totally out of control is uncalled for.

Posted by: franpasrt at June 25, 2005 03:06 PM (Lb175)

8 I think that these contractors should be held responsable just like any other American serving in that country. Those contractors run around that country knowing that they are not going to be held to any fire for whatever they do! That is why there are incidents like this one. I am in full understanding that you must do what you can to survive, but to totally out of control is uncalled for.

Posted by: franpasrt at June 25, 2005 03:06 PM (Lb175)

9 ATTN: I am Sir Usman Belo(Esq),a Solicitor, I am the Personal Attorney to Mr.F. Harry a national of your country who was an oil merchant in Nigeria. On the 21st of April 2001, my client, his wife and their two children were involved in a car accident along Sagbama Express Road, here in Nigeria and all occupants of the vehicle unfortunately lost their lives. Since then I have made several inquiries to locate any of my clients extended relatives, this has proven unsuccessful. After these several unsuccessful attempts, I decided to trace his relatives over the Internet,but of no avail, hence I mandated my secretary to search for any possible relative of my late clients in the Internet before the bank get the account confiscated or declared unserviceable,particularly, where the deceased had an account valued at about US$25.6m (Twentyfive Point Six Million United States Dollars). The bank has issued me an ultimatum notice to provide the next of kin or have the account confiscated within the next 21 working days. I then decided to present you as the next of kin of the deceased since my client is from the same country with you and his middle name is similar to yours , The said amount will be paid to you if you comply immediately and with all the necessary documents of the deceased in my possession it will be very easy and convient. Immediately the money is paid to you, 55% of the total amount will be for me, 40% for you, while the remaining 5% should be for miscalleneous expenses or tax as your government may require, I have all the necessary legal documents that can be used to back up any claim we may make,All I require is your honest cooperation to enable us see this transaction through. I guarantee that this will be executed under a legitimate arrangement that will protect you from any breach of the law, Please, you are advised to reply immediately through my alternative direct e-mail address stated as quote:usmanbelo2007@yahoo.co.uk I await your prompt response! Best regards, Sir Usman Belo(Esq). SENIOR ADVOCATE OF NIGERIA(SAN)

Posted by: Barr usman belo at June 27, 2005 09:14 AM (bbaXG)

10 You don't even know whole story of the contractors in Iraq trying to do their job. I personally know two of the contractors and know the story the marines are putting out is not true. They treated fellow Americans who also served their country in the military prior to becoming contractors like dirt. The Marines in my opinion feel they are above the law...Lets see what happens when the final truth is realved.

Posted by: shellita66 at July 02, 2005 11:24 AM (0r2lQ)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Fifth Man Detained in CA al Qaeda Case, More Arrests to Come

Multiple news agencies reporting that a fifth man has been detained in the Lodi, CA, al Qaeda cell investigation. Broadcast media is also reporting that the FBI expects to make more arrests. Further, search warrants have been executed on the Farooqia Islamic Center and the Lodi Muslim Mosque.

Reports also indicate that officials are backing off of earlier claims on the specificity of targets. Yesterday, an affidavit used to obtain the arrest warrant noted that potential targets included "hospitals and large food stores". The amended affidavit makes no such claim. Further, the FBI is backing off of the claim as to the location of the terrorist training camp and that photos of high-ranking US officials including President Bush were used for target practice.

Yesterday a number of pundits, including myself, questioned whether the fact that the US had intelligence reports indicating the location of jihadi training camps was evidence that Pakistan was being less than 100% cooperative in the Global War on Terror. Could pressure from the State Department, hoping to avoid a potential diplomatic fiasco with Pakistan, have forces the change?

Among the changes was the charge that one of the training camps was near Rawalpindi. Because Rawalpindi is the headquarters of the Pakistani military, it would be difficult to believe that the Pakistani military was not complicit in the camps.

I'm going to cross post this update here and in include it in my post from yesterday here. That earlier post will serve as an archive on this case.Fox News:

Five men, including two father and son pairs, have now been arrested as federal law enforcement officers try to determine whether they have uncovered a network of Al Qaeda (search) supporters in Northern California.
Father and son Umer and Hamid Hayat were arrested over the weekend in Lodi, Calif., on criminal charges. Three Pakistani citizens are also being held on immigration violations. Lodi is an agricultural community 40 miles south of Sacramento.
Two law enforcement sources have confirmed to FOX News that there is a connection between the Hayats and the Pakistani citizens....
The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents also have arrested Mohammed Adil Khan, Shabbir Ahmed and Khan's 19-year-old son, Mohammad Hassan Adil, for immigration violations. All three are citizens of Pakistan and Khan is affiliated with the Farooqia Islamic Center near Lodi, Calif. Ahmed is a citizen of Pakistan who currently functions as the Imam of the Lodi mosque.
Those three men are expected to eventually appear before an immigration judge.
An FBI affidavit says Hamid Hayat first denied any link to terror camps, but then told agents he attended an Al Qaeda camp in Pakistan for six months.
A law enforcement source confirmed to FOX News that search warrants have been executed at two mosques, homes of the Hayats, as well as that of the Lodi Muslim Mosque's imam. The case is now described as "ongoing investigation by the JTTF," the joint terrorism task force. FOX News was told that the connection between the Hayat's and Khan Ahmed "is more than just a meeting, there are many connections, here and possibly Pakistan."

California Mafia seems to have noticed this last night as well as other late-night West Coasters.

Annika reports from CA: "The late local news on at least two of the tv stations here in Sacramento was very irritating. They seem much more concerned about the possibility of anti-muslim "hate-crimes" than they are about the possibility that some terrorists might have been PLANNING TO BLOW UP HOSPITALS AND SUPERMARKETS!

The media are on the side of the enemy. (That means you KCRA and News 10.)"

UPDATE: Evan Kohlmann has video of a jihadi training camp in Pakistan here.

UPDATE PM: From the Lodi News Sentinel:

One of two Lodi men suspected of having ties to an al-Qaida terrorist camp was once accused of attempted kidnapping in a case that ultimately led to a misdemeanor conviction and an order to attend anger management classes.
Umer Hayat, 47, was arrested in 2001 for allegedly assaulting two children. Hayat and his 22-year-old son, Hamid Hayat, are now behind bars, accused of lying to federal agents who were questioning them about their links to terror training camps in Pakistan.

Posted by: Rusty at 09:26 AM | Comments (8) | Add Comment
Post contains 724 words, total size 5 kb.

1 We are getting the same crap in the SF Chronicle. Today there was the ongoing story of the investigation. Then there was a side article about the Muslims' "fear" of retaliation. They brought up the fact that somebody threw something at a Pakistani grocery store in 2001, right after 9.11. Gee. Then they interviewed one young man who insisted that there are no training camps in Pakistan. The obvious solution, of course, is for the Muslim community of Lodi to stand up and state loudly that they do not support terrorism or jihad. I am not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen.

Posted by: Scott in CA at June 09, 2005 09:57 AM (aDNFR)

2 Don't worry, even if the Government can't back the rest of the charges, they can still deport them for immigration violations!

Posted by: dave at June 09, 2005 09:59 AM (fsJ2z)

3 >>>"Then there was a side article about the Muslims' "fear" of retaliation." stfu you ragheads. If we haven't "retaliated" against you after your buddies blew our shit up on 9/11, we aren't going to. Now stfu and stay out of our way. That goes for the dhimmi Left too.

Posted by: Carlos at June 09, 2005 10:07 AM (8e/V4)

4 Retaliation. Yeah, it's about time for some of that. Let the sons-O-bitches blow up a hospital or supermarket, and they will taste some Biblical-grade retaliation. There are some mighty pissed-off people in this country, and I hope the morons in the government realize we're almost at critical mass. If they don't keep these jihidiots under control, they're going to lose control, and all hell will break loose.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 09, 2005 10:55 AM (0yYS2)

5 Is that what you want Maximus -- another Bosnia ? You've very quick to point to civil war as an answer to all things? I don't think anyone in my neighborhood is ready to slaughter the Muslims amongst us. where the hell do you live?

Posted by: dave at June 09, 2005 11:38 AM (fsJ2z)

6 So maximus you are saying if there is another terrorist attack on US soil you are going to attack the muslims in your community? You are a sick bastard.

Posted by: Jim at June 09, 2005 09:49 PM (FzCFs)

7 WWJD?

Posted by: Laurie at June 17, 2005 01:19 AM (nf7U8)

8 I NEED YOU TO GET CATHERINE SHANE MIDDLETON BOYD AWAY FROM MY FAMILY PLEASE!!! I ALSO NEED YOU TO GET MY BROTHER WILLIAM (JUST HAVE HIM CALL 999) TO GET 6 ROYAL PALACE GUARDS AND HAVE THEM BE IN CHARGE OF WILLIAM ARTHUR PHILIP LOUIS WINDSOR WITH DISNEY'S PRINCESS PENELOPE. HELP DISNEY OUT BECAUSE HE WANTS TO MAKE A CARTOON MOVIE LIKE ALADDIN WITH PRINCE WILLIAM AND PRINCESS PENELOPE :O) THANK YOU FOR HELPING DIANE DISNEY MILLER AND THE DISNEY FAMILY!

Posted by: HENRY CHARLES ALBERT DAVID WINDSOR at July 10, 2005 02:50 AM (dKkdT)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

June 08, 2005

Flag Desecration Images From the Religion of Patriots

Images from a video of the jihadis of the Islamic Thinkers Society below. This is the group that, at an earlier protest, had said about 9/11, "Next time we'll get all of New York,"

[UPDATE: You can view the video online here (with thanks to Shawn at Bare Knuckle Politics for uploading it) or you can download the entire video here (a little inconvenient becase of the wait time for free members, but the quality is better).

I had seen this story earlier at Jihad Watch, but didn't see the video until Michelle Malkin linked it. Michelle says "jump", I say "how high?" Also, you might want to follow her e-mail advice. Anyway, after seeing the video I'm disgusted. Since I know some people don't actually click the video links, I went ahead and took some screen shots of the video. If ever there was a clear 'fighting words' defense for assault, here it is.

Rob at Say Anything on the irony of it all (yes, this is true irony since words are being intentionally misused):

You know what I find amazing? The fact that the protesters are shouting about injustices done to Islamic people by the Americans, yet one of them about halfway through the video gets on the microphone and talks about how Islam is going to take over the world.

UPDATE: Thanks to Wunderkraut for pointing to this post by Jay Tea over at Wizbang. He makes a good point about our reaction to flag desecration vs. the childish actions of Muslims over Koran abuse. However, he is way off the mark in the rest of the post. As a loyal follower of the Commissar (who advocates vigorous debate amongst ourselves), I must stand up and point out that my right-wing friend at Wizbang makes a serious logical error.

No freedom or liberty can be understood as anything but ordered and contextual. What this means is that what is thought of as a liberty in one context must be weighed against other liberties, and that sometimes these acts may be even considered criminal. From the Schenck (1919) case, for insance, comes the famous (if not discredited) example that people generally have the liberty to say whatever they wish, but they cannot yell fire in a crowded theater. The context of the theater changes the permissible action of shouting fire.

War also changes the context. We are in a war with jihadi inspired terrorists. In the context of war, embedded in the further context of a community which may have at least some minor percentage of those that are sympathetic to the cause, then advocating for the cause of the enemy ceases to be protected speech. In fact, this is a classic example of of the exception carved out in Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969): "Freedoms of speech and press do not permit a State to forbid advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action"

I would argue that the word imminent ought to be dropped from the legal rule set up in Brandenburg. If 9/11 has taught us anything it is that terrorist acts may take years of planning. It has also taught us that our freedoms and liberties may be used against us in order to destroy those very liberties.

So, do I want flag desecration to be forbidden? No, of course not. What I do want is for incitement to take up arms against the US to be forbidden when the US is in a shooting war. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 04:11 PM | Comments (55) | Add Comment
Post contains 979 words, total size 8 kb.

1 how come none of these idiots are in custody, for providing comfort to the enemy?

Posted by: dave at June 08, 2005 04:27 PM (fsJ2z)

2 Indeed. Another question: How come no one went over and popped these bastards in the mouth?

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2005 04:28 PM (JQjhA)

3 probably afraid the cops would arrest them.

Posted by: dave at June 08, 2005 04:32 PM (fsJ2z)

4 Yeah, but could you see a jury convicting?

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2005 04:40 PM (JQjhA)

5 I fear I have no answer in the current climate. Did some of your posts disappear?

Posted by: dave at June 08, 2005 04:53 PM (fsJ2z)

6 Huh, what????

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2005 04:54 PM (JQjhA)

7 Just when I refresh I no longer see the "California cell", Al-sunni or Syria posts.

Posted by: dave at June 08, 2005 04:56 PM (fsJ2z)

8 Try, er, scrolling down...or maybe your refreshing on the individual archive link rather than on the main page???

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2005 04:58 PM (JQjhA)

9 twas my browser, I run it with a pretty funky configuration -- my bad!!

Posted by: dave at June 08, 2005 05:03 PM (fsJ2z)

10 Question: If these are 'home growns' like Johnny Taliban, what should be done with them? You would not have the luxury of deporting them to a country of origin, and would the court uphold any charge against them, especially as they would most likely claim to being denied their constitutional rights to freedom of speech / expression?

Posted by: dave at June 08, 2005 05:21 PM (fsJ2z)

11 Until today I thought all Americans are idiots. But now I see that some americans like Islamic Thinkers Society are not so stupid. I enjoyed the video,great show, thanks.

Posted by: sadam at June 08, 2005 05:46 PM (jw0u5)

12 Isn't "Islamic Thinkers" an oxymoron? And considering that the Koran is the word of Allah and not open to interpretation, what would there be to be think about?

Posted by: Don Miguel at June 08, 2005 06:12 PM (+KixN)

13 Now, does anyone need advice as to what kind of gun to buy or where to get ammo? We will be fighting in the streets in a few years people, if it takes that long, be prepared.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 08, 2005 06:39 PM (0yYS2)

14 Improbulus, get yourself an AK and a couple thousand rounds of ammo. It's a good trusty gun ideal for shooting jihadists and traitors. You can get a brand new one for $250 - $600, and the ammo goes for about $100 for a box of 1,000.

Posted by: Carlos at June 08, 2005 08:40 PM (8e/V4)

15 Can anyone tell me if the 1st Amendment right covers speech that calls for the overthrow of the federal government? Would this not be the same as yelling "fire" in a crowded theater? To call for the overthrow of the federal government and the Constitution is an act of sedition. Supporting a foreign power, even a terrorist group, is that not treason? Much like those wacky leftists who are trying to dismantle our military by banning recruiters from school campuses and enouraging soldiers to desert or become conscientious objectors, are they not acting againstthe government. I am all for free speech and the importance to protect it. But just like the "fire" example above... there are limits...

Posted by: Duncan Avatar at June 08, 2005 09:26 PM (Ban8v)

16 Thanks Carlos, but I'm already set, I just worry about the average slob who doesn't know which end the bullet comes out of. And yes, Duncan, it is seditious speech and not covered under the First, but our government has no balls. When the fighting comes, it will be up to We the People, because the government will be worried about offending those who are trying to kill us.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 08, 2005 10:56 PM (0yYS2)

17 I guar-RON-Fcuking-Tee these brave souls did this in the jihadi barrio, no other souls to come and put the smack down on 'em. Cowards.

Posted by: Justin_Wilson at June 08, 2005 10:57 PM (d6mij)

18 Hey Psychotic Maximus, Did you ever track down that osama guy with your super 1337 hacker skills? What a fucking bitch. Hope you shoot yourself while you're jacking off with your guns.

Posted by: Jim at June 08, 2005 11:20 PM (FzCFs)

19 Although I disagree with their methods, the idiots in the video never actually call for terrorist actions against the US. They are just trying to inspire other muslims to speak up against the US government. In total bad taste, but perfectly legal.

Posted by: Jim at June 08, 2005 11:39 PM (FzCFs)

20 Jim, I'm just thrilled as a punch drunk monkey that you actually recognize them as idiots. Well done!

Posted by: Carlos at June 08, 2005 11:47 PM (8e/V4)

21 I just don't understand why you people worry so much. I went to their website and its obvious this group is a bit radical. They even demonstrate against "progressive muslims". The fact of the matter is that if you look at their mantra, it says "Our struggle is always intellectual & political non-violent means." As long as they stick to that then what they do is perfectly legal no matter how stupid. The second they resort to violence they will be stopped. Note their website doesn't say "we will kill you, and get all of new york next time." If it did, they would be arrested. So all they can do is hold their stupid rallies that only makes matters worse and hurts Islam. So instead of being paranoid gun freaks, remember that they are idiots and that the second they even think about playing terrorist like their "heroes" they will be brought down by the government. Honestly you don't think the FBI is watching these guys? Freaking relax...

Posted by: Jim at June 09, 2005 12:02 AM (FzCFs)

22 I just don't understand why you people worry so much. Jim, the only thing that worries me is some jihadi smuggling a nuke into an American city, aided and abetted by people like this. Otherwise, no problem, it's just fun to hate these clowns.

Posted by: Carlos at June 09, 2005 12:06 AM (8e/V4)

23 Jim...I guarantee that nobody in here can track me down. Why would they anyway? Are the thought police gonna bust down my door? Really...they'd end up with a dead-end IP. I hope you're not calling me a bitch, btw. Maximus is way too versed with guns for an accident, but in the heat of passion, you never know. I wouldn't mess with him either because unless you are slick as shit he is smart enough to find you if he needed some target practice! Carlos...you just mentioned my #1 prediction. I'd be pretty surprised if that doesn't happen in our lifetimes, and what a sad day that will be.

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 09, 2005 12:08 AM (B9hEP)

24 I just can't stand people who threaten others over the internet like maximus has done before and now he is talking about going into the streets and fighting some war. It's ridiculous. Kinda funny how first you say you aren't afraid then you say I should watch out. I guess you are "slick as shit" then. Honestly shouldn't you kids be going to bed soon?

Posted by: Jim at June 09, 2005 12:17 AM (FzCFs)

25 Jim, some christian got his throat slashed, and his family's too, because he played these blog games with the wrong muslims. They actually hunted him down and massacred his family, but you Lefties (not you osama!) are more afraid of "christian fascists" taking over the country. Do you see why I have zero respect for you Lefties? You are morally confused, and that's putting it very kindly because I like you.

Posted by: Carlos at June 09, 2005 01:16 AM (8e/V4)

26 Jim, you are so naive. This is called intimidation and incitement. You can look at it anyway you like, but these guys standing on the street yelling this swill through loud speakers and burning the flag while people are out going about their daily business, cars driving by, etc. is blatant fear mongering. You think these scare tactics don't cause fear and intimidation? And all you have to say is to quote what's on their website? And you don't understand why anyone worries? Of COURSE the FBI is watching them. And as soon as one of them is arrested, you'll jump to their defense questioning their motives. How do you think the store owners behind them feel? You think they got any business that day? You think anyone felt safe to walk down that street? You might not be worried. Their not in your neighborhood. I, on the other hand, have the ability to think beyond my own friggin back yard. All you can do is quote their website and get technical about how the law applies to their activities. You seem to have a habit of not reading up on anything before you start berating people. Do you know who was bankrolling these guys and why their website went down for a while? I'll let you Google it. I'm not going to do all your work for you. Do you know there are reported instances being investigated of them threatening individuals who speak out against them? I think you need to loosen up your turbin and start paying better attention.

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 06:18 AM (YudAC)

27 Rusty, the video is gone now. As a matter of fact the entire website is gone.

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 06:39 AM (YudAC)

28 Every time I see our flag burned by a muslim, I am going to wipe my ass with a page from the Koran.

Posted by: FILTHY ALLAH at June 09, 2005 08:11 AM (yBHNA)

29 I will be happy to pitch in with bail money for anyone who throws one of these flag stompers a beating. I want their dirty beards ripped out. Step on our flag? Fuck you.

Posted by: OBsnooks at June 09, 2005 08:13 AM (yBHNA)

30 This just pisses me off. I'm afraid (not in fear) the rederic these fools spout is for real. We need to take this seriously. The are calling for the overthrow of our government by violent means. Sedition indeed at the least.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 08:38 AM (D3+20)

31 So, hit them first. Simple. I am sure the FBI is all over these idiots.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at June 09, 2005 08:43 AM (yBHNA)

32 I don't believe for one second the line about them using only non-violent means. Those jackoffs in Lodi went so far as to condemn the 9/11 attacks and signed a peace pledge with the local Jewish & Christian leaders. It's a bullshit tactic that goes back to the 11th Century. They should be jailed on sedition charges. I'm surprised they didn't get their asses beat. If anything fits the legal definition of "fighting words", it's this.

Posted by: disgruntledinca at June 09, 2005 10:02 AM (8DwXG)

33 I have the video if any one can host it. E-mail me if you can.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 09, 2005 10:59 AM (JQjhA)

34 They are having a little biker rally called "Hog Rock" this weekend in So ILL. I would like to invite all Jihadis and any other flag burners/desecraters to attend and demonstrate their craft to these fine ladies and gentlemen. There will be a wet t-shirt contest which is always won by two (good gay) chicks who take it all the way for cheers. There will also be a pickle licking and popsickle sucking contest as well as a bike show and bike pull. So grab up your flag and head on down I dare you. Just follow ILL 1 all the way south till you see the sign. (no my wife won't let me go)

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 12:02 PM (D3+20)

35 "some christian got his throat slashed, and his family's too, because he played these blog games with the wrong muslims. They actually hunted him down and massacred his family" No shit...Do you have a link about this Carlos? I never heard about this. That's fucked...was it on US soil too?

Posted by: osamabeenhiding at June 09, 2005 12:09 PM (B9hEP)

36 Osama, all prior references I could find to the story point to the NY Post which has moved it or something. However, here are a couple of blogs that wrote about it when it occurred (there are a lot more. A Google search will bring up a ton of stuff): http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/004660.php and they did a follow up here http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/2005/03/005241print.html and Powerline is another http://powerlineblog.com/archives/009210.php and their follow up is here http://powerlineblog.com/archives/009221.php

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 12:30 PM (fl6E1)

37 Oyster: I hate to burst yer bubble there because I would not put it past em. But I think later on this turned out to be a robbery staged to look like a jihadi murder. I'm pretty swamped so I don't have time to look up links but you may want to check into how this eventually panned out. I'm pretty sure they caught the guy though.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 12:51 PM (D3+20)

38 Howie, nothing was stolen, and they haven't caught anybody. It wasn't a robbery.

Posted by: Carlos at June 09, 2005 12:58 PM (8e/V4)

39 Rusty, the crux of my thesis is that I LIKE it when our enemies and other assholes go to such lengths to point themselves out. I'm far more concerned about sleepers and other covert agents; I believe the authorities got lots of pictures and will give lots of attention to those "Islamic thinkers" in the future. And while I understand that certain things change during wartime, the idea of desecrating a flag posing such an imminent threat doesn't pass my personal "smell test." Now, for advocating the violent overthrow of the government, and giving "aid and comfort" (which I understand has to mean something tangible, not just saying nice things about them), I'll buy the rope for hanging myself (thank you, Home Depot). But when it's limited to just abusing a flag, I'll content myself to laughing at them -- and keeping an eye on them in the future. J.

Posted by: Jay Tea at June 09, 2005 12:58 PM (Rfqkp)

40 and ps, Howie, what kind of an idiot would "coverup" a robbery by committing mass murder. That's the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

Posted by: Carlos at June 09, 2005 12:59 PM (8e/V4)

41 Howie, you haven't burst my bubble. Im aware of the developments in the case. Yet, there are still a number of unanswered questions that no one, not the police, not anyone will address. I didn't give Osama any links that I didn't read myself. If you'll read the follow ups on both sites, you'll see what I mean. I haven't passed judgement on this either way. Nor is it my intention to sensationalize. My apologies if it appears that way.

Posted by: Oyster at June 09, 2005 01:05 PM (fl6E1)

42 I took a few minutes and did find this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,149434,00.html Like I said these jihadi types will take credit for anything it's part of their terror tactics. Still not a lot of info anywhere.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 01:26 PM (D3+20)

43 I guess it's not the stupidest thing I've ever heard.

Posted by: Carlos at June 09, 2005 01:39 PM (8e/V4)

44 Oh yeah it's stupid alright. Nothing like a bunch of dope, no sleep, and physical addiction to turn a person into a total moron.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 01:42 PM (D3+20)

45 Had you all been reading the Jawa every minute of every day you would have seen my post on this. Yeah, they caught the scumbags and it turned out to have nothing to do with the threats that were made against him at that Islamic forum (which, as one or two of you may recall, I was a subject of some discussion at the same forum which made me a little scared, to say the least!!)

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 09, 2005 01:45 PM (JQjhA)

46 I had one other thought on why was it Fox is the only one you can search and get this info. Obviously most of the MSM would let you go on beleiving the other claims of responsability thereby aiding the tactic I just spoke of. Hey we all get caught up in it. Don't feel bad

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 01:45 PM (D3+20)

47 Howie: Pickle-licking contests? Who's sponsoring this? Biker-delicatessen owners? Now I've heard of everything!!!

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 09, 2005 02:06 PM (x+5JB)

48 YBP I'm not sure but it may be A.B.A.T.E. Last year there was about 20,000 bikes. Same kind of deal as the Sturgis and little Sturgis KY rallies. I intend to sit on the porch a while and check out the parade of freaks and bikes. I used to ride an old CB750 Honda quite a bit. Maybe in a few years I'll be able to take that up again.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 02:32 PM (D3+20)

49 Howie: A fellow teacher years back used to ride a Harley. He loved to hang with his "outlaw" biker friends. (Actually, decent chaps, many of them.)

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 09, 2005 03:10 PM (x+5JB)

50 Yeah the former president of the Joliet chapter is from my hometown. They are for the most part quite a bit of fun. Just don't ask about "business". His daughter was cool and a lot of them are just working stiffs like anyone else. Just watch out for the guy with tkob on his jacket. I certainly would not want to piss one off or burn a flag in front of them. I also probably would not accept a invitation to the club as well maybe I'm just not quite cut out for that.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 03:21 PM (D3+20)

51 tkob???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 09, 2005 03:56 PM (x+5JB)

52 takes care of business.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 04:42 PM (D3+20)

53 I mean tcob. Sorry I got a deadline bearing down on me like a mack truck.

Posted by: Howie at June 09, 2005 04:49 PM (D3+20)

54 Howie: I need to brush up on acronyms.

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 09, 2005 05:41 PM (C0pBN)

55 "Isn't "Islamic Thinkers" an oxymoron? And considering that the Koran is the word of Allah and not open to interpretation, what would there be to be think about?" Posted by: Don Miguel at June 8, 2005 06:12 PM Reply: "Islamic" means having to do with Islam. If you put the words "Islamic" and "Thinkers" together the meaning of that would be people who think islamically. Therefore, no it is not an oxymoron. It's funny how people here seem to act like they are experts on islam and muslim people yet they lack UTTERLY BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF THE RELIGION OR THE TERMINOLOGY associated with it. Do your research! And NO research doesn't mean going to biased websites and reading other ignorant views. It's not only illogical to that, it is dangerous. For muslims and non muslims a like.

Posted by: Person at October 18, 2005 01:39 PM (XZNSX)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Spanish Judge Wants to Question US Soldiers

Why does the US not want to have anything to do with international tribunals? Namely, because anti-Americanism in the world leads to acts of judicial tyrrany, such as this. Spain seems to be the worst of the lot these days. Make sure you check out the military reaction to the Spanish inquiry. Kind of makes you proud to be an American. more...

Posted by: Rusty at 03:00 PM | Comments (28) | Add Comment
Post contains 310 words, total size 2 kb.

1 Since the Spanish are a bunch of Appeasing cowards who fold faster than the french, this Judge can go f himself.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at June 08, 2005 03:10 PM (yBHNA)

2 >>>"Spanish Judge Wants to Question US Soldiers" Him and whose army? Oh, he doesn't have an army? Then I second Filthy Allah-- he can go fuck himself.

Posted by: Carlos at June 08, 2005 03:12 PM (8e/V4)

3 We have a 2nd motion for the Judge to go F- himself. Rusty, would you formalize this motion?

Posted by: Filthy Allah at June 08, 2005 03:15 PM (yBHNA)

4 All in favor, say "Si". Si. The Si's have it.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2005 03:17 PM (JQjhA)

5 Perhaps we can send this Judge a letter telling him of our motion

Posted by: Obsnooks at June 08, 2005 03:17 PM (yBHNA)

6 Well, since we're following Robert's Rules we better appoint a committe to draft a memo.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2005 03:20 PM (JQjhA)

7 Is that military quote kind of like the famous WWII quote "Nuts" or what???

Posted by: Young Bourbon Professional at June 08, 2005 03:40 PM (x+5JB)

8 Si here as well.

Posted by: Howie at June 08, 2005 03:40 PM (D3+20)

9 Sign me up. But tell me, why do we need a committee to draw up a memo that consists of two words?

Posted by: Oyster at June 08, 2005 03:51 PM (fl6E1)

10 it's actually three words, and Leftists love reading from memos.

Posted by: Carlos at June 08, 2005 04:04 PM (8e/V4)

11 another reason I'm glad we pulled out of the "world court"

Posted by: dave at June 08, 2005 04:10 PM (fsJ2z)

12 Si!!! Si!!! Si!!! I say we send the Mexican dwarf bullfighters as our contingent. http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/world/20050607-0500-mexico-bullfight-dwarfs.html

Posted by: Editor at June 08, 2005 04:20 PM (adpJH)

13 I say Si too, ole! andyx

Posted by: andyx at June 08, 2005 04:43 PM (Tgsjh)

14 So, now that we're all 'macho' and full of 'bravado' does any one have this guy's e-mail address? (notice the espanola ling?)

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 08, 2005 04:45 PM (JQjhA)

15 Rusty, you forgot "cojones".

Posted by: Carlos at June 08, 2005 05:35 PM (8e/V4)

16 Hope that this 2 murders will get a death penalty.

Posted by: tim at June 08, 2005 05:50 PM (jw0u5)

17 Ah, Tim, and just what do you base your slander upon? Besides whatever you pulled out of your backside?

Posted by: SPQR at June 08, 2005 05:55 PM (xauGB)

18 I say we send a Marine Expeditionary Force along with the 82nd Airborne, and he can ask all the questions he wants.

Posted by: Improbulus Maximus at June 08, 2005 06:41 PM (0yYS2)

19 Isn't this Spanish judge the same one who always threatens to do the same sort of thing to any world figure he doesn't like? Oh, no - I misremembered. It was a different Spanish judge that had Pinochet arrested in Britain back in '98. Nonetheless, it seems odd to me that judges might instigate this sort of action on their own, rather than rely on a formal investigative/prosecutorial team. Thank G-d we don't have activist judges here.... Oh. Well, not like that, we don't. Not yet.

Posted by: Russ at June 08, 2005 07:35 PM (zShs1)

20 I think the families of the soldiers accused should sue the Spanish judge for pain and suffering, libel, loading in a no loading zone, driving under the influence and any other damn fool thing they thing they can get away with. Or hell, maybe just anybody should sue this dickwad.

Posted by: vivi at June 08, 2005 08:49 PM (syZA+)

21 Not only do I support the move that we tell this judge to fuck himself in a well written letter, I move to deport Tim to Cuba from 30,000 feet. All those who say SI

Posted by: Filthy Allah at June 08, 2005 09:04 PM (cgKSA)

22 Judge Baltasar Gorazon is the one who had Pinochet arrested. He's also been one of the staunchest prosecuters of accused terrorists in Europe - ones involved in 9/11 and ones involved in Madrid as well. He's a relative bright spot in the sea of denial and appeasement when it comes to Europe and the WoT. So let's calm the rhetoric about all Spanish judges. The article gives no indication if this is the same judge. Regarding this one incident, I've already read about it several times, although I'm not going to dig for links. It was well publicized and then got a lot of replay during the Eason Jordan affair. It's already been investigated and the soldiers were backed up by a Boston Globe reporter who had been embedded with the unit and fighting with them the whole day - reminds you that not all MSM journalists are vile. Verdict: Accidental mistake made in the heat of a battle plus exhaustion from long intense fighting. One thing is clear, the International Left is launching an all out war on the War on Terror and their targeting the military, now that their preferred target, Bush, has proved hard to get.

Posted by: John in Tokyo at June 09, 2005 03:08 AM (rh782)

23 Yes, Garzon had this case briefly and didn't do anything with it. He is a serious anti-terrorism judge and I don't think he wanted anything to do with this case. Probably needs good working relations with the US. Never heard of this judge. I know the family wants compensation and this could be part of that effort. The interesting this is this could totally ruin what's left of Spain/US relations if Spain plays this one wrong. I don't think the US cares one way or the other and will not take it seriously.

Posted by: Kate at June 09, 2005 04:07 AM (tEo0x)

24 The spanish are cowards like the french. F- them. I hope they get bombed again. Degenerate Appeasers.

Posted by: Filthy Allah at June 09, 2005 07:50 AM (yBHNA)

25 The Spanish court system, I believe, makes the judge very much like the eqivelant of a prosecutor. That is to say, judges are not 'neutral observers' of a conflictual fight like in the US. So judges have broad investigative powers...which sometimes, like here, they obvioulsy abuse.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at June 09, 2005 11:47 AM (JQjhA)

26 Hey, hey, hey. Let's leave the French alone. Let's not forget they were right about WMDs in Iraq.

Posted by: Robert at June 09, 2005 02:38 PM (ByaZN)

27 Filthy F*** em I hope they get bombed again! That not a bit harsh. The spanish people dont deserve to be punished because their government are fools, Have you not had your Scott Biao fix this morning

Posted by: sparky at June 09, 2005 05:58 PM (F1nba)

28 IÃ‚Â´m witting from spain, thank you for your hopes "Filthy Allah"... nice words... About de Spanish court system youÃ‚Â´re right about the judge, here we have examining magistrate who makes the investigation and gets the evidences, but when he finish the investigation is other judge or a court (it depends on the possible condemnation) who pass the sentence. About judge Baltasar Garzon he is teaching now, I think in US.

Posted by: ARM at June 09, 2005 06:06 PM (mvC+Z)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Ansar al-Sunnah Terrorists Nabbed

Can you imagine a terror organization worse than Abu Musab al-Zarqawi's al Qaeda in Iraq? The Army of Ansar al-Sunnah is such a group. These guys specialize in killing any and every Kurdish leader, Turkish truck driver, Shia cleric, and Iraqi government official.

Here is a press release from Task Force Freedom as published by the Stryker Brigades in Northern Iraq: more...

Posted by: Rusty at 02:52 PM | Comments (2) | Add Comment
Post contains 224 words, total size 2 kb.

320kb generated in CPU 0.1508, elapsed 0.3482 seconds.
137 queries taking 0.2237 seconds, 648 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.

Search Thingy

Monthly Traffic

Pages: 185074
Files: 443
Bytes: 2.0G
CPU Time: 303:59
Queries: 18806676

Content

Posts: 5690
Comments: 76627

Feeds

June 10, 2005

June 09, 2005

June 08, 2005

Search Thingy

Recent Comments

Categories

Archives

Blogroll

Monthly Traffic

Content

Feeds